>
>
>00:17
changes or doesn't change is a false choise, because you already put it in notables and pushed it out to the world (and the aggregators). it's a serious dig, why would you dilute it with juvenality and misdirection?
>
>
>00:17
changes or doesn't change is a false choise, because you already put it in notables and pushed it out to the world (and the aggregators). it's a serious dig, why would you dilute it with juvenality and misdirection?
more of this "vote"on an anonymous board nonsense?
you added fictitious names where there were none previously, which is not the same as having no information.
trust kansas
https://rumble.com/vy0coe-maria-zacks-earth-shattering-testimony-kansas-senate-hearing-mirrored.html
>so you didn't look at the links?
is this going to be your broken record excuse until you ghost?
your voting construct, in this context, is irrelevant and practically fraudulent, merely designed to fake a consensus. you know it's bullshit. we know it's bullshit. yet you continue.