Anonymous ID: 1d91dc March 23, 2022, 5:53 a.m. No.15925005   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Makes sense why Biden nominated Jackson for SCOTUS.

 

Jackson is lenient on pedophiles and doesn't know what a woman is (I mean she's not a biologist, right? 🙄

Anonymous ID: 1d91dc March 23, 2022, 5:57 a.m. No.15925023   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5035

>>15924909

Why aren't you questioning atheism, it takes a leap of faith to believe that you can know the nature of the entire universe with such detail that you claim to know for a fact all of what it does not contain anywhere.

 

You never left this one planet, and yet you're not questioning statements purporting too know the entire universe.

Anonymous ID: 1d91dc March 23, 2022, 6:02 a.m. No.15925049   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5055 >>5085

>>15925035

No, people MUST have been born with innate awareness because humans as a species have this thought about God on its own.

 

If people were 'born' atheist then there could never have arisen faith in God in the first place.

 

All attempts to 'refute' or 'debunk' God have all failed.

Anonymous ID: 1d91dc March 23, 2022, 6:11 a.m. No.15925085   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5101 >>5137

>>15925049

>>15925035

The truth is that people must be 'conditioned' by selectively biased information in order to even repeat the atheist mantras and narratives.

Atheism is artificial, contrived, a 'new' philosophical phenomenon in the history of human thought that was not born out of first principles, but by an activist self-destructive attempt to 'negate' the natural order.

 

Atheism, the word itself, is fully and completely logically dependent on God. For it means "A" or 'anti', "theism" or "belief in God".

 

In other words, atheism is defined and understood as nothing but a meaning in relation to God, namely, the idea "I don't believe in God".

 

Funny, no physicist or biologist has ever explained how it is they know what they know by merely understanding their work as 'not cooking' or 'not chess' or 'not race care driving".

 

There is a positive substance that grounds knowledge of technology.

 

There is no such substance for 'atheism'. Atheism logically depends on people knowing the meaning of God without the Atheist's help, kek.

Anonymous ID: 1d91dc March 23, 2022, 6:18 a.m. No.15925119   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5145

>>15925055

You're pushing a faith about the nature of the whole universe, and your definition of 'proof' is deliberately framed to only detect and understand mechanical if-then causal patterns in the concatenation of events and cannot grasp the meaning of God.

 

Your positivism self-refutes by the way, for the description and meaning and practice of positivism contradicts what is 'permitted' knowledge by positivism itself. Positivism denies a priori knowledge is possible. yet the positivist claim is itself a priori.

 

There is no proof that all there is, is what you can detect by conducting positivist 'tests' that also presume a priori structure of reality, that causal relations don't change over the course of time.

 

Nobody has ever 'refuted' the existence of God.

Anonymous ID: 1d91dc March 23, 2022, 6:28 a.m. No.15925167   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5220

>>15925137

The notion that there is no God is extremely, highly, incredibly, massively extraordinary.

 

And yet you provide no evidence that all there exists is a complete and consistent sterile formal system of physical if then laws.

 

There is no evidence that causal laws change over the time because even your understanding of 'evidence' is itself a priori, not derived from experience, it's a presumption not derived from within positivism itself.

Anonymous ID: 1d91dc March 23, 2022, 6:30 a.m. No.15925177   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5187

>>15925145

The burden of proof is on the claimant who claims all there could ever exist, is sterile mechanical if then laws.

 

I am just 'denying' that claim.

 

Whoever makes your claim had the burden to prove it.

Anonymous ID: 1d91dc March 23, 2022, 6:47 a.m. No.15925266   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5268 >>5271

>>15925251

>The notion is extremely high

Citing the definition of a word the usage of which you completely messed up, but neglecting to correct your incoherent drivel, shows that there may be a detectable reason why your statements are so hollow and sloppy.

 

"The notion is too damn high!"

 

Hahaha haha

Hahaha haha

 

Come back when you learn how to string together coherent sentences, you low IQ inbred.

Anonymous ID: 1d91dc March 23, 2022, 6:52 a.m. No.15925292   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5294

>>15925278

>consensus crack shill fail

>>15925278

>consensus crack shill fail

>>15925278

>consensus crack shill fail

>>15925278

>consensus crack shill fail

>>15925278

>consensus crack shill fail

>>15925278

>consensus crack shill fail

>>15925278

>consensus crack shill fail

>>15925278

>consensus crack shill fail

>>15925278

>consensus crack shill fail

>>15925278

>consensus crack shill fail

>>15925278

^^^

Shill seething