How exactly can ANYideabe 'forced' on you here?
Anti-Bible shills are the worst. Claiming to know what everyone else 'needs', projecting your own inability to reconcile God with free will and smearing anons as lacking free will for acknowledging a facet of reality.
You would need to have actually DEMONSTRATED flaws in logic for your claim to even make sense.
The fact there was a 'threat' in the first place indicates in your story that the invaders are guilty.
It is human civilization and reason controlling the passions that transcends 'might makes right' that humans got this far at all in the first place.
Worshiping and idolizing animals because they lack what humans have, is a self-destructive path.
Rothschilds are not representative of 'the Jews' you Marxist collectivist.
BTW, the Rothschilds are Satanists, not Jews.
Revelation 3:9
>Know nothing of them.
Oh here we go, now the trotting out of 'you don't know what it's like to BE a bat'.
Worms have survived for millions of years, but that doesn't mean the quality of life is desirable.
People have been killed by atheists (Stalin, Mao, etc) for worshiping "a" God that wasn't 'the elite humans'.
GTFO with your victimizing and feigning of ignorance of the life of a worm.
Atheistic communism killed 150 million people during 20th century alone.
Mocking what is true about others that is also true about you, means you're mocking yourself.
You're just projecting.
No, you're still projecting YOUR own anxiety and inability to reconcile the issues on your own psyche.
None of what you said has any semblance of what's going on in my heart and mind.
>Fuck your one world religion
Fuck your one world religion.
You're still projecting your own fear.
New Durham filing: asking for extensions on discovery deadlines because:
A. There are so many documents
B. Ukraine situation has slowed FBI’s ability to produce discovery & declassification process
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.vaed.515692/gov.uscourts.vaed.515692.44.0_1.pdf
Am I here to answer questions that suggest I hold specific convictions?
No.
Free will should be DEFINED first, because there is no guarantee that two anons discussing it would even be thinking of the same exact thing.
The way I understand free will, it is not in 'negation' to physical laws or any such 'constraints' therewith.
It is 'partial' from the perspective of a God