>Jackson: you can be doing this for 15 minutes, and all of a sudden you are looking at 30, 40, 50, years in prison.
>Graham: Good!
agreed
GOOD
why is this a fucking question?
the internet makes it easier
ergo
its lesser of a crime?
what in the actual fuck?!?!?
how do we get this in EVERYONES face
is this what the American People thinks?
fucking UNANIMOUS and BIPARTISAN support for reducing CP sentencing in the Senate…
why am I not surprised
>i am not following this argument at all
nor am I anon
its backpedaling
and it is DEFNEDING the internet market for Child Pornograpgy
using the INTERNET as the market place makes it so much easier to distibute tens of thousands of images
ergo
to participate in that marketplace is LESS of a crime
than the mail order marketplace
what in the actual fuck?
>ain't fair
why should we be fair to those that seek out and view child pornography?
serious question
do we have a moral obligation to be "fair" to these people?
>32-year old man who sent an image of his own 10-year old daughter, you substantially reduced, not only the guidelines, but the recommendations.
yeah
thats waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay worse than the 18yr old that got 3 months that Hawley drilled down on yesterday
>and received a 22 year prison sentence as a result.
because he wasnt a mason
seriously
fucking look into the cases
they throw the book at who they want too
they soft ball who they want too
its ALL bullshit
>Jackson: …I sentenced him [pharmacy robber] above the requirement of the law because I thought it was warranted to make clear to him, that this was a terrible, terrible, thing he did.
its okay when she gives the child pornograpy cases reduced sentences because she TELL THE PERP how bad it was
She tells them what it does to the children.
(THEY KNOW WHAT IT DOES TO THE FUCKING CHILDREN. THEY ARE WATCHING IT. WHAT IS DONE TO THE CHILDREN IS EXACTLY WHAT THEY ARE SEXUALLY ATTRACTED TOO)
holy
fuck
I seriously want to see what "the people" think about this
are people so brainwashed that they will accept this logic?
>Please Lord, do not let this thing (since she doesn't even know what she is) become a Justice
do you think the next one they put up will be BETTER
if this one gets blocked???
kek
>Ukraine Blocks Trans Women Refugees: "They Are Men, Must Go Back & Fight"
TOP
fucking
KEK
>There's good Masons too…
I agree anon
Many masons in my family too
I defintely dont hate my own kin
BUT
The "good" Masons
if they still OWN any of the Lodges out there
are NOT winning
they are supposed to the be the hidden guiding hand of our nation anon
Their being in the shadows is ALLOWABLE if their influence is GOOD
For at least 100 years from our founding, I think it can be argued that it was GOOD
I dont think that argument can be made anymore
the Nation is NOT being guided down the path of good, and it has not been for a LONG time
I will not castigate any "good" mason, who is truly fighting the good fight
but you MUST conceed, faithful fren
that the good men do not currently own the lodge