Lee quoting Jackson: "I don't feel that it is appropriate, necessarily, to increase the penalty on the basis on your use of a computer, or the number of images, or prepubescent victims as the guidelines require, because these circumstances exist in many cases, if not most, and don't signal an especially heinous or egregious child pornography offense."
Interesting timing for Albright; she was an 'election observer' during the fraudulent 2014 election in Ukraine.
Cruz: You told [Blackburn] that you couldn't define what a woman is, that you're not a biologist. I think you are the only supreme court nominee in history who's been unable to answer the question, 'what is a woman'. How would you determine if a plaintiff had Article 3 standing to challenge a gender-based policy without being able to determine what a woman was?
Cruz: I am a Hispanic man. Could I decide I am an Asian man and challenge Harvard's discrimination because I made that decision?
Jackson is visibly uncomfortable as Cruz demolishes her.
Child pornography of toddler…she gave 28 months, 64% below what prosecutors asked for.
Jackson: I've said what I've going to say about these cases.