>>15929998 (pb)
I'm sorry, what?
No one has a voice unless they bake or take notes?
Since when?
And why would anyone say "tyb" under those weirdly authoritarian conditions?
>>15929998 (pb)
I'm sorry, what?
No one has a voice unless they bake or take notes?
Since when?
And why would anyone say "tyb" under those weirdly authoritarian conditions?
You're the bitch.
This may come as a surprise to you: RT is still accessible in the US. It has also been considered "not great sauce" until very recently. Sure, some bakers have put it in notes, along with southfront and ll kinds of crap.
Why it's become SO VERY NOTABLE recently is quite the mystery.
It is.
Hopefully anons will drop the lame ass "thank you baker" crap. If they looked over at Meta, they'd see there isn't much to thank the baker, BO, or whomever for.
They track and harass anons. It's annoying but what can an anon do?
Who knows. Anons are kind of strange lately. HOWEVER, things change over time and that's not a bad thing.
Scott, you need to back off a bit. It's gross and obvious.
They don't issue retractions for a reason, Mr. Galactic.
And who said anything about the NYT?
no one should thank the fame fags and name fags for their service.