dChan
Anonymous ID: 5ad7c2 March 24, 2022, 1:14 p.m. No.15935676   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5697

>>15935532

>IF YU FAGS COULD PLEASE CALL OUT PRIOR TO END OF DOUGH, THAT WOULD BE GREAT

EMERGENCY (the "e" in ebake) Bakes quite often occur when it is noticed that the current bread is @751 and there is no new bread in the catalog

 

at this point, how does an ebaker profer such a warning?

 

should ebaker just never bake an ebake if the breads are already full?

 

>ffs the state of these ebakers

….right

its the EBAKERS fualt that the bread hit @751 posts before a new bread was available

…okay…

Anonymous ID: 5ad7c2 March 24, 2022, 1:23 p.m. No.15935747   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5755 >>5782

>>15935697

>EBakers mostly see at 710 or 720 what needs to happen and can quickly grab the EBake.

I have ebaked a few in the last couple weeks

each time it was because I watched the catalog with all breads @751 for ~5 mins

 

each time, even though I baked THAT late, and there ended up being multiple ebakes

somehow the one I threw up ended up being the one to get filled

 

other times I have just at and watched to see how long it would take for SOMEONE to ebake once all breads had been filled

 

I CAN bake, but I am mostly digging, memeing and shitposting

I dont keep track of the current post count

ever

I doubt many anons who have the capacity to ebake if required are constantly keeping tabs on the current post count

 

you DEFINITELY can not rely on those that need to step in once it reaches the level of EMERGENCY to be monitoring the post count at all times

 

or see my original question

if no one was monitoring post count

and the bread hits @751

and that is the first "trigger" to indicate an eBake is necessary

 

how is a warning given?

 

It is unreasonable to EXPECT a warning from an ebaker

its nice when it happens because anon was on the ball

but I dont see how you can expect it

or chastise ebakers for not doing so

 

/shrug/

Anonymous ID: 5ad7c2 March 24, 2022, 1:27 p.m. No.15935768   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5819

>>15935724

>I've only walked out on a couple movies, the first being "It's alive".

I use "Frankenhooker" as my baseline comparison

 

Me and a peer watched the entire film

it was absolutely fucking terrible

but we never got to that "walk out" moment

 

so, we use it as a comparitor

if we get to that "walk out" moment in a movie

then that movie is "worse" than Frankehooker

a true achievment indeed

Anonymous ID: 5ad7c2 March 24, 2022, 1:36 p.m. No.15935815   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15935806

>tell people that I'm not White, I'm Jewish

welcome to the Ashkenazi tribe brother!

now throw a stein/berg/cohen on the end of your surname and we'll call it official!

 

L'Chaim!

Anonymous ID: 5ad7c2 March 24, 2022, 2:10 p.m. No.15936020   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15936007

I prefer 2

for slightly different reasons

but I am basically right there

 

I think if we deny this one we get a worse one after

I think the tactical win is to own the hearings with soft on CP in the courts and Senate in general

and then confirm her for the longer term win