Hi Jim. Fuck you. If they're old, why'd you turn off the media server?
Here's a workaround: https://twitter.com/jayroll43256805
He doesn't care, he be posting on twitter. #HunterBiden
Yeah, you can't trust them to stay silent while MIL industrial congressional complex takes over the prison planet. How dare they reveal secrets. /s
Yes.
and a MEDIA SERVER to FIX because admins are RETARDED or MALICIOUS
>You said anyone leaking secrets is untrustworthy, and now you draw the argument to including everything and every secret.
I see you, moron. You who cannot judge what is evil and what is not. You who would attempt to convince me of ridiculous logic.
I see you.
Deus vult fiat justitia ruat cælum.
Do you understand what you're up against now?
> create mistrust
> more doubt that can be seeded
Maybe shady characters doing shady things is the fault of the shady characters and not the revealer who informed you of them.
When this happens psychologically it's called victim blaming.
Jim is why the board is tater salad.
So your thought is self evident because previously made judgements. Better hope you never were wrong, then, because then your causality chain is all fucked up and retarded.
Jim turned off the media server, cover uppers claim ddos attack, reasoning being hunter biden info dropped "for real this time" despite "all the images have been seen before" but there was a wider release which people are posting on twitter, but Jim is scared and taking proactive action THUS Jim is why the board is tater salad with a broken media server BECAUSE huge drops.
Safest would be to not run an image board. Just to let you know how this line of logic works. You cannot be 'safer than sorry' and simultaneously run this board with the claims made. Is your point that you prefer censorship?
Not yet, but it stands, violated, and testament to fuckery. What I like to ask is whether it's still possible in the code for it in opposition to Q's wishes even now.
100% truth official story? Can't think on your own? Remember the last time this happened during the SOTU, who told you the truth then? An anon did before the official administration.
That is based on the IP's used at the time legitly or not. It really was from those IP's in that ipspace. Whether it was really DoD or not depends on how you look at it.
Tangentially related was this warfare maneuver because Obama was set to export to foreign entities ARIN: https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2021/04/pentagon-explains-odd-transfer-of-175-million-ip-addresses-to-obscure-company/
>FutureCrime, thought control
How would Jim know this without having broken the law himself? Think about this for a moment. This logic is being used to deny service.
Ahem. BACKDOOR'd? HMMM, hint of ownership?
>jpg work fine jpeg not so much
Hmm. Test time.
jpg is HRC times article shown in chinese garb.
jpeg is trump with sword of truth.
Ah yes, that's why the red text anons want the laptop evidence hidden so they turn off the image servers an… hey wait a minute, it's all backwards!
"I can't argue against your logic, therefore I pick a part of your identity to argue against"
So convincing?
Because the admin is too cheap to hire people to manage the images to fix actual problems once they exist and simultaneously too stupid to implement an AI engine to do the work for him or to hire someone smart enough to? Yes. That is how stupid it is to turn off image servers in the name of anti-CP, because there has NEVER BEEN A MOMENT WHERE IT'S NOT A RISK. So you look at it and it obviously is NOT ACTUALLY the reason. Stop buying that bullshit. Anyone can post at any time. Think about it.