It's the damn Jews.
>https://www.theepochtimes.com/fda-tells-doctors-in-8-states-to-stop-using-covid-19-treatment_4364197.html?utm_medium=epochtimes&utm_source=telegram
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said sotrovimab, a monoclonal antibody used to treat COVID-19, can no longer be used in Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont.
Breaking the 4th wall is an "acting" thing.
The fourth wall is a performance convention in which an invisible, imagined wall separates actors from the audience. While the audience can see through this "wall", the convention assumes the actors act as if they cannot. From the 16th century onward, the rise of illusionism in staging practices, which culminated in the realism and naturalism of the theatre of the 19th century, led to the development of the fourth wall concept.[1][2]
"Breaking the fourth wall" is violating this performance convention, which has been adopted more generally in the drama. This can be done through either directly referring to the audience, the play as a play, or the characters' fictionality. The temporary suspension of the convention in this way draws attention to its use in the rest of the performance. This act of drawing attention to a play's performance conventions is metatheatrical. A similar effect of metareference is achieved when the performance convention of avoiding direct contact with the camera, generally used by actors in a television drama or film, is temporarily suspended. The phrase "breaking the fourth wall" is used to describe such effects in those media. Breaking the fourth wall is also possible in other media, such as video games and books.
With viewpoint discrimination, the protections of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act come in to play.
The newspaper isn't "require" to publish your letter to the editor because they are accountable for everything they publish. The type of content moderation Twat/FB are using, they have become Publishers and have legal accountability for literally every word and photo on their site that they "allow".
Section 230 protects them as a digital public square, until they start behaving like publishers.
I can't tell if you are stupid or intentionally ignorant. Viewpoint discrimination is targeted deletions, to control a narrative, not general deletions after a period of time, or deleting spam. Words have meaning, you should study them.
Just follow the law…Section 230 of the CDA. Since they are "acting" as publishers, they should lose their protections under 230.
Lift the liability restrictions…on all of them.
Let Big Pharma be sued for vaxx injuries
Let Big Tech be sued for content suppression, libel, slander, defamation, etc.
If Twitter and FB can't compete, while being held to the same standards as the average American, then they deserve to go bankrupt and be replaced with something better.
SCOTUS is the Supreme Pharisees…sucking the law's cock all day and night. They have to though, because it's their character in the movie.
>The united states is just one huge crime syndicate…
Well duh. All this bitching about "the law"… "The law" is for using the poors to increase the wealth of the rich.
That's all Catholic garbage. Don't buy what that Jew is selling.