WHY THE PUSH TO "STOP AT RIVER" AS A TACTIC SUGGESTED BEFORE THE EVENT? THEY REALLY DO NOT WANT ANYONE TO TAKE THE >>>>>BOHEMIAN GROVE<<<<<
GEORGE WEBB ALSO PUSHED THIS 'STOP AT RIVER' GEOPOLITIC. IT IS BECAUSE IT'S ESSENTIAL TO PRESERVE STRATEGIC TARGETS FOR A LITERAL DYNASTY
And add "nigger cock lover" for normie distribution, you blackfaced pepe.
I'm Sorry. I recant that I ever called you a fucking idiot moron. That was unbecoming of me to say that you're a doofus shitspectacle of thought fuckery. I'm sorry that I ever dehumanized you because I thought you deserved it and would have preferred if someone shot you in the face. I recant all that.
>People could live or die because a TOTAL LOSER tries to be LESS of a FUCKING LOSER.
How do you think he learned? Ah right, the REACTION is how he learned. THEREFORE you are STUPID TO SUGGEST THAT WE NOT REACT AS WE SHOULD. Because you would rather he not recant it because it wasn't as bad a reaction next time someone runs their mouth and lets the tyrannical homicidal juices flow.
SO MAKE A NOTABLE POST ABOUT HOW HE RECANTED YOU FUCKWIT, IT DOESN'T MEAN THAT THE EVENT DID NOT HAPPEN.
Chirality is not what is being discussed, he's talking about misfolding proteins a la Foot and Mouth disease and a precursor to all this COVID RNA gene therapies.
NO. IT IS NOT GOOD. IT IS BETTER THAN BAD BUT NOT EVEN NEUTRAL YET. IT IS A START TO RETURN TO NEUTRAL BECAUSE HAVING SAID NOTHING IS MORE GOOD THAN SAYING EVIL AND RECANTING. YOU SHOULD ANALYZE WHAT ACTUALLY IS A GOOD THING.
Big Mike.
Big Mike goes by Michelle. For now.
I recanted all of it. See what I mean now?
I am telling you that it'sNOT OBJECTIVELY GOODit's simplerBETTER THAN BAD
FIX YOUR FUCKING MORALITY, SHIT'S ALL RETARDED.
Michelle Obama hates the flag of my nation. You can fuck right off with your attempted identitarianism.
Incorrect. I'm making a point that EVEN THOUGH I RECANTED, it doesn't change the fact that I said it at all (or referred to it in this case, in a hypothetical argument to frame the context of my argument)
YOU ARE MIXING ABSOLUTE AND RELATIVE.
Flux.
Meanwhile, in normie land where we don't have retards seeing divine providence in retards momentarily depriving us of their evil thoughts, and calling them good for it, just because they FAFO'd with public speech cluelessly that the public wouldn't like it, we'll continue to screech that it had ever taken place at all because a good person would realize it was evil to begin with.
When I provide IT support to a person, I feel immense rage because I'm a programmer, not a handholder.
Was it the specific thing I was talking about, or do you think I'm a neoplatonist who regularly veers off into substitutions of one thing for another because hey it's all good brah?
Is it though? Cough.
Hush, Puscifer
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU'RE SAYING.
YOU THINK THERE'S A PERFECT FORM OF A THING IN THE ETHER AND THAT REFERRING TO AN IMPERFECT COPY IS INTERCHANGEABLE WITH ANOTHER SYMBOLIC COPY.
YOU ARE AN IDIOT SINCE YOU COPY THE PERFECT FORM OF AN IDIOT IN THE ETHER AND NEOPLATONISTICALLY I AM CORRECT COPYING THE IDEAL FORM OF CORRECTNESS
WOW GEE IM A NEOPLATONIST
Oh lord. IT support for command line? if I even went there which is a big id, I'd go copy this exactly because otherwise is just too much
To make definitive statements about the ideal form is indeed absurd, BUT -NEO- Platonism accepts the absurd.
Guys. All this heat and moving fast/moving slowly is all based on observation. Isn't it obvious that these are sentient forms and they're moving fast or slowly because they haven't gotten or are about to get chicken nuggets?
Putin exchange rates will reveal that the FED system has long ago sold off all gold and they're fucked. They're been dependent on 'loop capital' setups for far too long.
Go join the Plato cult, then. The fuck you care what I think for? Here, just imagine I made the perfect counterargument in ideal form or one approximating. Saves me having to explain this shit, for sure.
"Human's inhumanity to humans" -wait, so humans doing things to humans makes them inhumane, despite the nature of a human doing a thing to a human is the most humane thing to do but your judgement renders the human as inhumane?