Thank you, Baker. Take yer spinach.
Thank you, anon, for supporting the current thing.
Unfortunately, the current thing is no longer current.
Please transition to the next thing.
>reinvent the wheel every time we wanted to make something new.
We can only make a better wheel by questioning the current wheel.
If we don't question the current wheel then it cannot be improved.
It can always be rounder. Or flatter. Or angled better.
There is nothing wrong with wondering whether a wheel should be square or oval. There are many examples of wheels that are not perfectly round. There is a purpose to the madness of making a crooked wheel.
Should the cylinder of an automobile engine be perfectly round? What about the off-center wheel that is designed to lift the cams? So on and so on. Once we stop questioning the design of the wheel then we stop making better wheels or wheels more suited to a special purpose.
Crank me up. Oh wait, isn't a crank just a crooked bar? Should a bar always be straight?
I'll stop now.
>Dad is illegitimate in his position and hence doesn't have the power to pardon anyone
A parallel to this is the US dollar. As long as everyone believes that the dollar has value then it has value. It ceases to have value when people cease to believe that it does.
The president, fake or not, is the president as long as people believe that he is the president. Somehow, the public must be convinced that he is not the president. Until then, he can do what the fuck he wants. Right?
>>What's the plan to keep dad from pardoning son?
>Wake people up
…with the dirt that Putin digs up in Ukraine.
We have it all anyway but corroboration helps a lot.
There is also the question of "how do you introduce evidence?".
Oh! Hello Mr. Kitty.
>The statute of limitations was over long ago even if Hunter didn't have immunity.
What is the limit? How long ago did he commit the crimes?
>Imagine how beautiful this world would be if it was white's only.
Delusional. Whites may have built this civilization but they weren't nice people while they were at it.
>There's a statute of limitations for sedition/treason?
No but there's not a state of declared war either so treason is not a crime as defined in the Constitution.
They will GLOW BRIGHTLY once Putin tidies up the mess in Ukraine.
All of their panicked hollering will make them look very stupid.
>I thought it was declared since 9/11 and never rescinded.
Yeah, that thought occurred to me. Not sure what the specifics are or whether it really meets the requirements for a declaration of war. Need a lawfag on this.
Kek. Grumpy old fart.
I thought you didn't do typos. Otherwise, you'll have to comment every damn post.
Besides that, correcting your own post is not cool. Preferential treatment.
>better than ignoring a typo… smh
Debatable. In your case, the word "thing" is obviously a typo of "think". Anons grasp that easily. More serious is a case of a missing "not" which has the potential to create ambiguity.
Myself, I resist fixing an obvious typo even though it may bother me. Grrr, must…not…fix. Kek.
>deep fakes getting too real
Jim Stone claims that this video is a deep fake:
https://media.vidmax.com/videos/6/2/3/f/6/623f69bcb4cd8.mp4
Not sure myself but I do see a couple of telltale signs. Video games often get the ground wrong because I notice all these light-coloured stones that just seem out of place. The girl's visage appears too smooth.
>Focus is on Oscars and not the V Thomas text messages
Ever heard of multi-tasking? We're doing both and much more.
Just noticed the bread title: GITMO's Back On The Menu Boys
That should scare the bejeezus out of those damn conspiratorial bastards.
May they burn in hell after their beheading at Gitmo after being tortured with maggots in their eye sacs after being forced to eat horse manure fed to them by the ugliest faggots on earth after shitting their diapers in court while the judge laughs hysterically. What else can we inflict on these assholes?
>8kun servers sucks balls right now…
Seems to be working fine now. Was a big slow during the night.
>that's why i give zero fucks if they think they can somehow benefit by "profiling" me in any way.
For my part, I don't have any presence on Big Tech's social media garbage sites, I have a dynamic IP address, I keep Javascript mostly turned off so they can't even run their crapware on my browser and I also have the browser set to toss cookies and cache at shutdown. Whatever profiling they do is a waste of time and resources because I never see their stupid ads anyway. Dunno what else they can do with the info since they can't even associate it with my real identity.
>I thought that's where you got your joke from.
Nah. I played that on people when I used to work night shift. People would come in for day shift with a cheery "good morning" or just "morning" and I'd go all grumpy on them, kek.
>The actual top-tier weaponry would split the solar system in half.
Oh yeah? My dad can beat up your dad.
Nukes don't work. Nyah, nyah, nyah.
Are you going to make yourself noticed again?
You can't shut down the topic by calling everybody a shill and drawing attention to it.
What spy school did you go to?
>when you make sauce-less declarations
Muh evidence. Typical shill tactic is to demand evidence that will be rejected out of hand anyway if presented so why bother?
Critical mass is a fiction. Makes no sense. There is no indication in nature that radioactivity levels are dependent on mass. None. If that were the case then uranium deposits around the world would have different radioactivity levels depending on how the uranium is concentrated.
Bogus bullshit. If you're so expert then explain how alpha, beta or gamma radiation can create a fireball.
>you made the claim. bring the sauce or stfu.
I can make sauceless claims if I want. You can either ignore it (which you should) or you can make a stink about it because you feel like you have to defend an embedded belief inculcated by a government and media that have been lying to you all of your life.
With all of the lies surrounding the Second World War why would the myth of the atomic bomb be the one thing they did not lie about?