Anonymous ID: 7dbeb0 March 28, 2022, 8:44 p.m. No.15968034   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15967504.PB

Question: When do birds sing?

Answer?: After global thermonuclear war.

Watch the pen. On the clock. And all that shit.

 

>>15967504

 

I honestly dont know why anon would say birds sing after thermonuclear global war, when everything and everyone is dead; exception maybe cockroaches.

 

The answer in nature of when birds sing are between 4 am to 6 am in the morning. My guess would be if related to media, the project mocking birds singing (or repeating their script at that time); or many network anchors etc were reporting the corruption to those who can be trusted.

 

“Birds sing at 4-6 am every morning”

 

Scientists call this the dawn chorus. It can start as early as 4:00 a.m. and last several hours. Birds can sing at any time of day, but during the dawn chorus their songs are often louder, livelier, and more frequent. One idea is that in the early morning, light levels are too dim for birds to do much foraging.

 

Why do birds start chirping at 3am?

Hereof, what does it mean when birds chirp at 3am?

 

Why these birds are chirping the middle of the night is a more challenging question. One popular theory among ornithologists is that most species that chirp at night do so for territorial reasons. This seems to be particularly true of mockingbirds.

 

Also Know, why is there a bird chirping at 2am? We can hear birds singing at night (2am) in trees adjacent to the house in mid-December. The main purpose of singing is to attract a mate and defend a territory. Robins are one of the few birds that hold a territory throughout the winter so continue to sing when the majority of other birds have stopped.

 

https://findanyanswer.com/why-do-birds-start-chirping-at-3am

Anonymous ID: 7dbeb0 March 28, 2022, 9:45 p.m. No.15968228   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8351 >>8390 >>8513 >>8576

>>15967470PB

Patel Patriot's Devolution: Part 19!

About pgunnels

6.2K

followers

The Reading Epic Threads community is the most cutting-edge group of independent news researchers in the world. Patrick Gunnels, Brian Cates, Duane Cates, Patel Patriot, Saint Richie, JB White, Matthew Trump, and many more, contribute to a real understanding of the Strange War we're living through.

https://www.twitch.tv/pgunnels

 

>>15967104

>https://www.twitch.tv/pgunnels

 

Transnational Crime EO by Trump

You remeber the Time Article about taking down Trump, i think they are the unnamed co-conspirators. They fit the bill of national and international conspiracy, quote from article below (they just had to brag about it)

 

Time Magazine: “Well-funded Cabal Of Powerful People” Secretly Conspired To Defeat Trump

“a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information”

 

https://patelpatriot.substack.com/p/devolution-part-19?s=r

 

https://legalinsurrection.com/2021/02/time-magazine-well-funded-cabal-of-powerful-people-secretly-conspired-to-defeat-trump/

Anonymous ID: 7dbeb0 March 28, 2022, 10:19 p.m. No.15968351   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15968228

Conclusion on Patel Patriot Trump has been going after Transnational Crimes since the beginning, refining it more and more. What organization or organizations represent Transnational Criminal Syndicate? Bingo, The Clinton Foundation in all its iteration. His conclusion (if you have time to read his whole article, its well worth it):

 

 

https://patelpatriot.substack.com/p/devolution-part-19?s=r

Anonymous ID: 7dbeb0 March 28, 2022, 10:45 p.m. No.15968424   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15968320

So sad he hasnt already become the man he wants to be. If he had been working on it and he really wanted to be a better man, he would have done it by now. Like leaving HW once and for all, but he’s sick and tortured by his conscience and cant face the memory of some things much worse than slapping a man.

 

Children Will, ask forgiveness what you’ve all done with children! Not inly forgiveness but also ask for the punishment you deserve

Anonymous ID: 7dbeb0 March 28, 2022, 11:02 p.m. No.15968454   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15968337

His name is weid too

 

Stew

 

stew

stoo, styoo

intransitive verb

To cook (food) by simmering or boiling slowly.

 

To undergo cooking byboiling slowly or simmeringlike boiling a frog

.

To suffer with oppressive heat or stuffy confinement; swelter.

 

Peters

 

peter (redirected from peters)

Pe·ter (pē′tər)

n.

See Table at Bible.

Peter, Saint Died c. ad 67.

The chief of the 12 Apostles. He is traditionally regarded as the first bishop of Rome and author of two epistles in the New Testament.

 

pe·ter 1 (pē′tər)

intr.v. pe·tered, pe·ter·ing, pe·ters

 

To diminish slowly and come to an end. Often used with out: Their enthusiasm soon petered out.

Anonymous ID: 7dbeb0 March 28, 2022, 11:14 p.m. No.15968479   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15968470

Yep, posted the definition of stew and he fits it

 

stew

stoo, styoo

intransitive verb

To cook (food) by simmering or boiling slowly.

To undergo cooking by boiling slowly or simmering.

To suffer with oppressive heat or stuffy confinement; swelter.

Anonymous ID: 7dbeb0 March 28, 2022, 11:22 p.m. No.15968494   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8498 >>8529

Did They created the Ukraine war to get TV off pf DC truckers, bet you a dollar the war inUkraine, will be iover when the Truckers leave DC (if they plan on leaving). Bidan probably told the press “dont give them coverage”!

 

Bidan didnt want yo look like Trudeau, but now he looks worse

 

https://twitter.com/DannyDrause/status/1508572698942873601?s=20&t=_lzPbtUKpwr43bVfKFGLVA

Anonymous ID: 7dbeb0 March 28, 2022, 11:32 p.m. No.15968509   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8513 >>8576

This asshole will get us killedand this is fucking humiliating to have him speak. Seriously what a fucking liar! Why did they let him out of his basement?

 

28 Mar, 2022 21:55

 

Biden doubles down on Putin comments

 

US president says he was expressing “moral outrage” and not policy, and that “nobody believes” he was serious

 

US President Joe Biden on Monday stood by his claim that Russian President Vladimir Putin should not remain in power, but insisted it was his expression of moral outrage over the conflict in Ukraine and not a policy change, and that nobody was supposed to take it seriously.

 

Biden unveiled his 2023 budget proposal at the White House on Monday, but the press corps was far more interested in the remarks he made during last week’s trip to Poland – including when he said about Putin, “For God’s sake, this man cannot remain in power,” a remark widely interpreted as calling for regime change in Moscow.

 

“I’m not walking anything back,” Biden said when asked about it on Monday. “I want to make it clear: I was not then, nor am I now, articulating a policy change. I was expressing moral outrage that I feel, and I make no apologies for it.”

 

Asked if his remarks complicated the diplomacy about ending the war, Biden said no, arguing that Putin’s “escalatory efforts” were what “complicates things a great deal, but I don't think it complicates it at all.”

 

In response to another question about what he had meant in Warsaw, Biden said that “people like this shouldn't be ruling countries,” again referring to Putin.

 

Another reporter reminded Biden of his extensive foreign policy experience – he sat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee for years – and asked if he could see how his words could be interpreted as a policy statement, or used as propaganda by Russia.

 

“No and no,” Biden replied. “Because it’s ridiculous. Nobody believes… I was talking about taking down Putin. Nobody believes that.”

 

Biden even insisted he never told US troops in Poland they were going to Ukraine when he said “when you get there, you’ll see,” or that the US would “respond in kind” to a hypothetical chemical attack by Russia, or that he called for regime change in Russia.

 

“None of the three occurred,” he told Fox News’ Peter Doocy. “You interpret the language that way.”

 

The US president said he was talking to the troops about “helping train the Ukrainian troops that are in Poland.”

 

As for the chemical weapons remarks, Biden shrugged it off.

 

“I’m not going to tell you. Why would I tell you? You’ve got to be silly,” he told the reporter, whom he called a “stupid son of a b**ch” back in January. When Doocy said the world wants to know, Biden smiled and said “the world wants to know a lot of things.”

 

On Saturday, White House aides hastened to “clarify” Biden’s remarks in Warsaw, telling reporters that whatever the president had said, what he meant was that Putin can’t be allowed to “exercise power over neighboring countries.”

 

Secretary of State Antony Blinken went a step further on Sunday, saying that “we do not have a strategy of regime change in Russia – or anywhere else, for that matter.”

 

By Monday morning, however, the official talking point was that Biden was just expressing a personal opinion.

 

“I think that speech that you saw was a reflection of his emotional connection to this issue and commitment to European security, to NATO and to Ukraine(WTF hes the resident ypu dont get emotional doe to connect ypure the fucking resident, how can they even justify this response?),

 

” White House Energy Security Coordinator Amos Hochstein told the Dubai Global Energy Forum. “I think it was a very emotional, very personal view,” he added, saying that in his opinion Biden “was not indicating a change of US policy and regime change.”

 

https://www.rt.com/news/552867-biden-putin-regime-change/