>>15970923 PB

>WHOA!

Indeed

>if true

There is no "if" in this.

For those who missed it, Gaetz just grilled FBI cyber #2 on the laptop.

#2 used the all too familiar, "Not in MUH purview".

Gaetz then requested Unanimous consent to enter the Laptop, Held up what appeared to be a hard drive and said (semi quietly) "Which I have."

Nadler tried to stop it.

Things were paused and the R's and D's huddled.

Gaetz came back and reworded the request to submit, "content from, files from and copies from the Hunter Biden Laptop".

No objections were made and it was entered into the record.

Calling Tom Fitton: FOIA their asses.

https://twitter.com/RepMattGaetz/status/1508845184246849539

>>15971197

There is no "if" in that, either.

Think about Durham's last filing regarding:

"The officials preparing and reviewing documents at the FBI and …"

Listen to Kash's last update on Durham and the declass process. (Don't have the link available at the moment.)

What is the significance of, "content from, files from and copies from the Hunter Biden Laptop", as opposed to the original request?

Can Durham now enter HB laptop docs to the court?

>>15971351

It's easy to miss someone's point when you aren't told what it is.

>>15971023

>>15971297

>>15971514

https://www.congress.gov/help/congressional-record

"About the Congressional Record

After each day that Congress is in session, the proceedings are printed in the Congressional Record (CR) and available the following morning."