>>15972943 pb

Russian channel posts translated [personal channels not corporate media]

Старше Эдды, [3/29/2022 11:30 AM]

The Armed Forces of Ukraine got a rocket along Oktyabrsky, I was there just a few days ago. Apparently, the RAV warehouse detonated. Against this background, I would like to once again remind everyone that we are at war with a very serious enemy, and if you see a hat thrower or a TV expert talking about easy victories, put him on the list of shit eaters and don’t listen. The war will be hard, we will destroy the enemy, you just need to treat this as a combat job, not a TV show.

https://t.me/vysokygovorit/7081

Старше Эдды, [3/29/2022 12:32 PM]

On the military side. Apparently, the Kiev direction is currently recognized as unpromising and all forces will be focused on the destruction of the Kharkov-Donbass enemy grouping, as the most combat-ready.

There will also be active battles in the area of ​​Nikolaev and Odessa. From a military point of view, this is correct. We just need to officially admit mistakes, and not pour donkey urine into people's ears. And fight.

P.S. Now I’m watching Russia 24 and the goofy announcer declares that the cause of the explosion in Oktyabrsky was the human factor, apparently the ensign unsuccessfully smoked near the RAV warehouse.

Why one of the main channels carry such garbage, I don’t understand. The Armed Forces of Ukraine are constantly shelling this area, our air defense is coping. No one can give a 100% guarantee that all targets will be hit. Glory and low bow to the air defense officers, talking heads from TV - shit on a shovel.

https://t.me/vysokygovorit/7082

Lobaev Z, [3/29/2022 5:09 AM]

⚡️A decision was made to radically reduce military activity in the Kiev and Chernihiv directions - Deputy Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation.

It looks like a rationale for the concentration of troops in order to eliminate the Eastern group of Nazis.

Although in any case the game of negotiations is very dangerous, precisely from the point of view of the potential buildup of the internal political situation.

A truce in any form is risky because it can enable the enemy to bring up reserves and regroup. To exclude this, the West should announce a moratorium on the supply of weapons, which is unrealizable. Or we have to close the border, which is difficult.

And a peace concluded on certain conditions, which the deep people consider a defeat, can potentially become disastrous for the country.

https://t.me/lobaev_vlad/3331

Lobaev Z, [3/29/2022 5:09 AM]

⚡️A decision was made to radically reduce military activity in the Kiev and Chernihiv directions - Deputy Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation.

It looks like a rationale for the concentration of troops in order to eliminate the Eastern group of Nazis.

Although in any case the game of negotiations is very dangerous, precisely from the point of view of the potential buildup of the internal political situation.

A truce in any form is risky because it can enable the enemy to bring up reserves and regroup. To exclude this, the West should announce a moratorium on the supply of weapons, which is unrealizable. Or we have to close the border, which is difficult.

And a peace concluded on certain conditions, which the deep people consider a defeat, can potentially become disastrous for the country.

https://t.me/lobaev_vlad/3331

Lobaev Z, [3/29/2022 6:02 AM]

[Forwarded from Афанасьев Z]

[ Photo ]

Dear colleagues who are now talking about Khasavyurt and other shameful pages of our history, I will remind you that it is too early to sprinkle ashes on your head.

In my memory, Russia has withdrawn troops from Syria THREE TIMES, each time with serious media processing both inside and outside the country.

Each time, headlines like “ISIS defeated Russia”, “Russia is fleeing” and so on rained down.

Remember the headline of the forbidden American svoboda: Enter once and withdraw three times.

How the operation in Syria ended, I think everyone remembers. How it will end in Ukraine - we will soon see. First - the destruction of a group of thugs in the Donbass.

https://t.me/Andrafanaslive/5089

https://t.me/lobaev_vlad/3333

>>15965675 pb

[transcript]

President Bashar al-Assad on the Ukraine war

As we see, the world is not moving towards stability, on the contrary, wars spread and instability is what we see in the foreseeable future. Today, the events do not concern us in their details as much as the connections between these events and the connection to the past events. When we make this connection then we can read the future. At the same time, we must link these events with the Syrian positions during the war and before the war and with the old Syrian political positions. When we make this connection we can say whether the Syrian vision was once true or false, realistic or far from reality. Therefore, if I want to talk about events today, their essence today, and in the past is the West, because the West has been managing world policies or affecting the world negatively for hundreds of years perhaps more than two centuries.

All the problems of the world over hundreds of years are caused by wars, occupations and killings which the West has always sought in order to achieve interests. If we want to address any topic, we must talk about the common denominator today. First, because the suffering of the world, as I said, is caused by the West. Secondly, because our suffering in Syria and in this region which is now over a hundred years old since the Ottoman exit in 1916 is directly linked since the French occupation until today with the Western countries that have not stopped plotting against Syria. The other side is that the West today is going through a historical juncture regarding its role, presence and image, specifically after the Ukraine war. The Syrian and Libyan wars affected the West but the Ukrainian war now is essential for the role of the West. The fall of the Soviet Union was an important detail but the West considered itself strong.

The real transformation took place since World War II and this (Ukrainian War) is the second major transformation. Since all problems and disturbances are related to the West. I will go through some points related to it and for us in Syria most of them are old and known but for the Western audience they are new and for many of the deceived people in the world, they are new and these points are what we will build our future vision on, perhaps for decades, not for days, months, or years.

cont…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoBkJPglIO0

https://www.bitchute.com/video/4UmFQypqYGjr/>>15974328

>>15974623

cont…

The first point is the colonial West. When I say colonial West, we are not talking about peoples but rather about Western regimes and the institutions that drive Western policy. So when we talk about the West, I describe the active institutions: the lobbies, the governments or the regimes that work closely with them. The colonial West has not changed at all throughout its history until this moment, there is no change. The difference is that America replaced Britain and France in the fifties and those two countries, along with the rest of the countries in the West became dependent on American policy. The West has become more experienced in lying and deception and more adept at wearing deceptive masks in order to deceive different peoples. The West today uses more humanitarian terms but it commits more crimes against the peoples of the world. In fact, all the masks that they wore during those decades they could not deceive Syria even once and this is the problem of the West with Syria and with the Syrian people. But the events that took place in Syria forced the West to gradually remove these masks.

The Ukrainian war came to push this West to remove the remaining masks at once. The West completely naked in front of its audience first, and in front of the rest of the peoples secondly. But removing these masks was not without a price. Removing these masks destroyed the foundations of false Western propaganda which they began to adopt after World War II. The first point is that the West has proven that international law does not concern it at all and it is the West that has destroyed international law the most, headed by the U.S. and turned the world into a jungle. Here some ask, with a little romance and simplicity. What is the legal justification or what is the legal document for the Russian intervention in Ukraine? We must know that the law is not what is written, but rather what is applied. If in the country there is a written law but there is no judiciary and their are no judges and there are no police, then what is the value of law? The country will effectively become a jungle and whoever respects the law will have no place in this country, the country will be run by only for outlaws, bandits and thieves. The truth is that the world since the fall of the Soviet Union has been a jungle and the thieves are the West. There is no international law, there are no international institutions and there is nothing. So, talking about international law in the absence of its existence and its non-enforcement is meaningless and these words were said publicly by Russian officials exactly 15 years ago that the policy that the West seeks is the policy of power. And the politics of the strongest and therefore they seek to turn the world into a jungle.

As for freedom of expression and opinion which is one of the most important foundations that the West boasts about it has fallen into the abyss.__At least since George W. Bush came about 20 years ago the entire Western world came with on opinion and everyone is moving in the same direction. Governments, lobbies, companies, media and, most recently social media. __What is this democratic West in which hundreds of millions of people live but which has only one opinion? When the U.S. is angry with Syria suddenly all opinion becomes on opinion against Syria with the same terminologies? When they want to defend Zionism, and this thing continues, everyone speaks on language. And more recently, when they became angry with Russia and allowed violence towards it so too was one opinion. The truth is that freedom of opinion and freedom of expression is to have one opinion that is identical with the West. This is the truth.

The freedom of property is one of the most important pillars of the capitalist system. Suddenly when they become angry recently with Russia, they confiscated all the property of the Russians abroad whether for the state or for businessmen and this reminds us completely of the confiscation of Syrian funds, and the confiscation of Libyan funds and before that, Iraqi, Iranian and others…So the freedom of property is the freedom of the West's ownership of the property of others.

The West has shown its racism and hidden hatred against everyone who is not like them and this does not apply only to Muslims and to Arabs, as we think… No. It applies to everyone. The hatred that we have seen today against Russia we have not seen against any country in history. But this hatred is not new.This hatred is centuries old towards Russia and towards others. One of the important examples of World War II was the West was very pleased with Hitler's entry into Russia. And no one talks about more than 26 million victims in Russia. The West had no problem with him and they did not try to attack him. Rather, they attacked when he began to lose and in the final stages of WWII so that Russia would not be able to hijack this victory, as the West thought. So they carried out the Normandy landing.

cont…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoBkJPglIO0

https://www.bitchute.com/video/4UmFQypqYGjr/>>15974328

>>15974630

>>15974623

cont…

The West proved it had no friends and no enemies. The West proved that it had only one enemy; whoever stands in the way of it's material interests. Neither communism, not Islam, nor Nazism, nor China, nor Russia, nor any other party, are enemies of the West. If they meet their interests, they are friends and if they stand against interests, they are enemies. Zero principals. But the last and most ugly truth - and few people know about it - is the West is against Nazism and Zionism is against Nazism. Few know that the Nazis in Ukraine, the Nazi organization that worked closely with Hitler on the security, military and ideological levels. When the second World War ended some of the leaders were sent to Europe and some to America. In the fifties, the CIA demanded that the American administration lift the ban on these Nazi groups because they were a necessity for the U.S. in Ukraine which was part of the Soviet Union. What confirms this talk today - this is historical talk - is that Zelensky is a Jewish Zionist but supports the extremist nationalist organizations that fought in WWII with Hitler and part of them participated in the massacres against the Jews. How can this Jewish Zionist support these organizations? The West supports these organizations, which are called today the right-wing "Azov" and the Zionist Israel that cries over the victims of the Holocaust supports a leader who supports the Nazis that killed the Jews. This confirms that the West lies with everything it says, and the West only cares about controlling the world, plundering resources and filling its coffers with money.

But what does all this mean to us? What concerns us is when Syria started dealing with the West in the past over decades. Syria didn't deal with the West from an extremist point of view Syria was accused of being extremist, unrealistic, and not reading the world map well. We never proceeded except for adhering to our rights and adhering to our realistic vision, because this West offers us nothing. So, Syria has proven to be correct in its vision and positions. Secondly, we cannot bet on the change of the West in the foreseeable future because the one whom the centuries did not change will not be changed by the decades. Therefore, we cannot expect that this West will come one day and play an objective, just or helpful role in any of the issues. The third point, what the Syrian state and the Syrian government put forward in 2005 about heading east is now more correct than ever before. First, because events prove the fact that the West cannot be relied upon. Secondly because the East has become a developed East capable of meeting the needs of most countries in the world, away from siege, far from superiority and far from controlling our destiny in every field.

Today we do not doubt the progress of the West technically, scientifically, organizationally and administratively but we have no doubt that the political West is a morally degenerate West. In short, this picture will shape our vision of the West in the future and the way we deal with it. It differs only very little from the vision that was formed over the past decades. So as we see the world is heading towards conflicts and the price of these conflicts has begun to be reflected on everyone in every corner of this world, especially in the economic aspect. We are part of this world and we have to think seriously about what solutions exist to face this harsh reality.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoBkJPglIO0

https://www.bitchute.com/video/4UmFQypqYGjr/>>15974328

>>15974632

"Secondly because the East has become a developed East capable of meeting the needs of most countries in the world, away from siege, far from superiority and far from controlling our destiny in every field."