Anonymous ID: 75a794 March 30, 2022, 10:09 a.m. No.15977130   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7149 >>7779

https://www.dailywire.com/news/gop-maine-senator-who-opposed-barrett-confirmation-says-she-supports-judge-ketanji-brown-jackson

 

GOP Maine Senator Who Opposed Barrett Confirmation Says She Supports Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson

dailywire.com/news/gop-maine-senator-who-opposed-barrett-confirmation-says-she-supports-judge-ketanji-brown-jackson

Republican Maine Sen. Susan Collins said Tuesday that she will vote to confirm Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court.

 

Collins, who met with the judge Tuesday afternoon for the second time, told The New York Times in an interview that Jackson had explained away some concerns Collins had after the judge met with the Senate Judiciary Committee last week.

 

“I have decided to support the confirmation of Judge Jackson to be a member of the Supreme Court,” said Collins, who opposed the confirmation of Justice Amy Coney Barrett in the fall of 2020, objecting that her nomination was too close to the presidential election.

 

The GOP senator said that Jackson had reassured her that she would not bend “the law to meet a personal preference,” saying that Jackson met Collins’ personal standards for Supreme Court justices.

 

“In recent years, senators on both sides of the aisle have gotten away from what I perceive to be the appropriate process for evaluating judicial nominees,” Collins said. “In my view, the role under the Constitution assigned to the Senate is to look at the credentials, experience and qualifications of the nominee. It is not to assess whether a nominee reflects the individual ideology of a senator or would vote exactly as an individual senator would want.”

 

If Collins votes for Jackson, The Times reported, Vice President Kamala Harris would not have to cast the tie breaking vote — an “unprecedented outcome that some saw as potentially damaging to the court’s standing,” the outlet reported.

 

Collins was also one of three Republicans to vote for Jackson to be confirmed to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in June, according to The Times.

 

Her announcement is bound to frustrate Republican senators, such as Republican Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley, who highlighted Jackson’s record of repeatedly giving lenient sentences to criminals who watched or distributed child pornography.

 

While Jackson and her allies have defended her record by saying that her sentences were based off the recommendations of probation officers, Hawley and other senators pointed out that Jackson’s sentences were even more lenient than those recommended to her.

 

Collins did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Daily Wire on this point.

 

The Maine senator also told The Times that Jackson had assured her that she would “forever stay out of” the issue of packing the court.

 

“I don’t expect that any of the justices I am going to agree with on every decision — that’s impossible,” the senator added. “But I do want them to be able to be devoid of prejudgement, partisanship, preference and to be impartial and rule consistent with legal precedent, the language of the law and the Constitution.”

 

When Collins voted against Barrett in 2020, she said that the vote did not have to do with Barrett’s character.

 

“Because this vote is occurring prior to the election, I will vote against the nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett,” she said in a statement. “To be clear, my vote does not reflect any conclusion that I have reached about Judge Barrett’s qualifications to serve on the Supreme Court.”

 

“What I have concentrated on is being fair and consistent, and I do not think it is fair nor consistent to have a Senate confirmation vote prior to the election,” Collins added, a sentiment widely expressed by Democrats at the time.

 

COMPRIMISED

Anonymous ID: 75a794 March 30, 2022, 10:10 a.m. No.15977142   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Column: The Unanimously Liberal Tilt of the 'Fact Checkers'

newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/tim-graham/2022/03/30/column-unanimously-liberal-tilt-fact-checkers

March 30th, 2022 6:10 AM

Tim Graham

Now that the Ketanji Brown Jackson hearings are complete, we have collected another fascinating exhibit of the leftist tilt of “independent fact checkers.” Just try and find a single fact check on anything Judge Jackson said. Try and find a single evaluation of any statement by a Democratic politician touting Jackson – from Biden and Dick Durbin on down.

 

Checking liberals and Democrats is apparently not listed among their job duties.

 

On March 28, White House deputy press secretary Andrew Bates addressed Judge Jackson’s qualifications. Bates claimed what speaks to the strength of her public record “is the multitude of fact-checks from the press, from retired judges, and from former prosecutors who have dismantled attacks brought by a small group of GOP senators.”

 

“Dismantling” Republican critiques is the job of the Fact Check community? That’s what it looks like.

 

Bates applauded the nation’s largest Democrat rags for their efforts. He touted the Washington Post Fact Checker article by Glenn Kessler titled “These Trump Judges Failed Hawley’s Sentencing Test for Jackson.” He also cited New York Times fact-checker Linda Qiu’s article, titled “Critics of Jackson’s Child Sex Abuse Sentences Backed Judges with Similar Records.”

 

The Biden press aide correctly noted “This was all on top of a raft of other fact checks already establishing that the basis of these criticisms was dishonest.” Democrats can float on a raft of “fact checks” attempting to censor or downgrade the reach of Republicans.

 

The targeting tilt was unanimous.

 

The Associated Press team offered three “checks” with a self-evident aggression: “Republicans twist Jackson’s judicial record,” “Republicans skew Jackson’s record on crime,” and “Senators misrepresent Jackson on abortion.” Why they left “Republican” out of the third one is anyone’s guess.

 

Reuters offered two “fact checks” defending Judge Jackson, that it was “missing context” when she attacked loud anti-abortion protesters, and that it was “misleading” to say she accused President George W. Bush and Donald Rumsfeld of being “war criminals,” when she complained terror suspects were tortured at Guantanamo.

 

CNN’s Daniel Dale offered one fact check on the “war criminals” complaint.

 

FactCheck.com offered three “checks” that energetically explained why Judge Jackson was unfairly maligned, including her views on critical race theory.

 

Snopes.com wondered “Was Ketanji Brown Jackson Drama Scene Partners with Matt Damon in College?” The verdict was “Research In Progress,” which shows you Snopes wants the clickbait before the research is even completed. That’s not a fact check at all.

 

It’s absolutely shocking that Andrew Bates didn’t bask in the glow of PolitiFact. Since March 22, these transparently partisan servants offered eight “fact checks” attacking conservatives and Republicans in defense of Judge Jackson.

 

Add to that one bizarre attack on a Trump fan on Facebook with 2,700 friends. He was ruled “False” when he claimed the Kavanaugh hearings drew more live coverage than the Jackson hearings. That is “True,” and PolitiFact is “False.” Once they started throwing around shoddy rape claims, The Price Is Right and The View had to take a hike.

 

This is why Jacob Siegel of Tablet magazine proclaimed “America’s new public-private ‘Ministry of Truth’ mainly serves the interests of the tech platforms and Democratic Party operatives who underwrite and support the fact-checking enterprise. This, in turn, convinces large numbers of normal Americans that the officially sanctioned news product they receive is an ass-covering con job.”

Anonymous ID: 75a794 March 30, 2022, 10:12 a.m. No.15977154   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Justice Department preparing Ray Epps 'disclosure'

 

washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/justice-department-preparing-ray-epps-disclosure

 

by Daniel Chaitin, Deputy News Editor |March 30, 2022

 

The Justice Department is preparing a "disclosure" related to Ray Epps, a man some suspect was an FBI informant goading the crowd ahead of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot despite his denials.

 

Assistant U.S. Attorney Karen Rochlin revealed the plan in court Tuesday as lawyers for some Jan. 6 defendants demand more details about Epps.

 

00:00

/

01:50

“What I can … tell the court is that the U.S. Attorney’s Office has been working on a disclosure pertaining to Mr. Epps,” Rochlin said, according to Politico. The federal prosecutor also said the information would be ready to share with defense lawyers who ask for it in, “give or take, another week or two," and stressed that the plan does not imply agreement by prosecutors that any informants were "fomenting rebellion" on Jan. 6 as suggested by some of the defandants' lawyers, the report added.

 

Epps, an Arizona man and former Oath Keeper, had been on the FBI's Capitol Violence most wanted list before he was removed without explanation after nearly six months. He was seen on video urging people to march to the Capitol in the hours leading up to the riot, fueling speculation.

 

The House committee investigating the Capitol riot released a statement in January that said its investigators interviewed Epps.

 

“The Select Committee is aware of unsupported claims that Ray Epps was an FBI informant based on the fact that he was on the FBI Wanted list and then was removed from that list without being charged,” the panel said in a statement. “The Select Committee has interviewed Mr. Epps. Mr. Epps informed us that he was not employed by, working with, or acting at the direction of any law enforcement agency on January 5th or 6th or at any other time, and that he has never been an informant for the FBI or any other law enforcement agency."

 

An attorney for Epps, John Blischak, declined to comment on the disclosure but did tell Politico, “Mr. Epps provided a full disclosure to the House committee."

 

Illinois Rep. Adam Kinzinger, one of two Republican members on the Jan. 6 committee, tweeted that Epps was taken off the list "because apparently he broke no laws." He also said Epps "has cooperated and is nothing but a Jan 6 protest attendee, in his own words."

 

An attorney for Paul Russell Johnson, a Jan. 6 defendant accused of assaulting police at the Capitol, claimed that Epps could help their case. “Our argument is that James Ray Epps was involved in the attack on the Capitol in a way that would be beneficial to our defense," said the attorney, Kobie Flowers, during a status conference Tuesday, according to Law & Crime.

 

With the Justice Department up until now staying tight-lipped about Epps, Fox News host Tucker Carlson, Republican lawmakers, and former President Donald Trump have fanned the flames of unproven theories involving him.

 

“How about the one guy, ‘Go in, go in, get in there, everybody,’ Epps. ‘Get in there, go, go.’ Nothing happens to him. What happened with him? Nothing happened,” Trump said at an Arizona rally in January.

Anonymous ID: 75a794 March 30, 2022, 10:57 a.m. No.15977506   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7512 >>7518 >>7523 >>7597

''BREAKING (TASS): German Chancellor Scholz and Russian President Putin have agreed to hold talks on gas purchases for roubles.''

11:24 AM · Mar 30, 2022·Twitter Web App

 

https://twitter.com/ElectionWiz/status/1509189935848431622

Anonymous ID: 75a794 March 30, 2022, 10:59 a.m. No.15977512   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7523 >>7529

>>15977506

 

https://www.dw.com/en/germany-says-putin-agreed-to-keep-payments-for-gas-in-euros/a-61310461

 

Germany says Putin agreed to keep payments for gas in euros

dw.com/en/germany-says-putin-agreed-to-keep-payments-for-gas-in-euros/a-61310461

News

The Russian leader said money would be paid into Gazprom Bank, which is not a subject of sanctions, and then transferred in rubles to Russia, according to a German statement.

 

Russian President Vladimir Putin told German Chancellor Olaf Scholz that Europe could continue paying for gas in euros, a German readout of a call between the two leaders stated.

 

Putin said the money would be paid into Gazprom Bank, which is not a subject of sanctions, and then transferred in rubles to Russia.

 

"Scholz did not agree to this procedure in the conversation, but asked for written information to better understand the procedure," said the German spokesperson.

 

Putin had said last week that "unfriendly" countries would have to pay for Russian gas in rubles.

 

G7 countries have said payment in rubles would breach contracts.

 

Germany on Wednesday triggered an emergency plan to manage gas supplies that could see Europe's largest economy ration power if a standoff over a Russian demand to pay for fuel with roubles disrupts or halts supplies.

Anonymous ID: 75a794 March 30, 2022, 11 a.m. No.15977529   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7553

>>15977512

>Gazprom Bank

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gazprombank

Gazprombank

Private banking company

 

Gazprombank, or GPB, is a private-owned Russian bank, the third largest bank in the country by assets. Since November 2014, Yuri Shamalov's Gazfond is its largest shareholder. The bank’s principal business areas are corporate banking, retail banking, investment banking and depository services. Wikipedia

 

Customer service: 011 7 495 913-74-74

CEO: Andrey Akimov (Nov 2002–)

Founder: Gazprom

Founded: 1990

Headquarters: Moscow, Russia

Anonymous ID: 75a794 March 30, 2022, 11:56 a.m. No.15977836   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Disney has come out of the closet, not only as a corporation intent on the advancement of sexual identity, but also with a corporate mission to influence the sexualization of our children. This open expression of their corporate mission is disturbing on many levels.

 

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/03/29/disney-president-of-entertainment-shares-corporate-objective-to-promote-lgbtqia-issues-targeting-children/#more-230816