Anonymous ID: d628f1 March 30, 2022, 1:48 p.m. No.15978485   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8494

>>15978159

>Can I get some confirmation on this baker's?

 

>Every 12,500 years or so the Sun refreshes its outer shell, which is currently burning and giving us warmth and light.

 

This is not consistent with a current understanding of solar physics. The temperatures and pressures required to achieve nuclear fusion occur in the core region of the sun or any star, not the outer 'shell' or photosphere. Stars do form 'shells' or layers where fusion occurs, but this is usually after exhausting their hydrogen. Shells of fusion of heavier elements, like helium, occur near the cores in stars experiencing an advanced stage of stellar evolution, depending on the initial and residual mass of the star.

 

There may be issues with solar output of a cyclical nature, but your explanation is inadequate.

 

>Every half cycle, 6000Years+-, the earth's core flips over inside the earth

 

Are you sure you mean 'core' and not a pole reversal of the earth's magnetic field? These are common in the geological record.

 

>Can someone confirm my thoughts?

 

Unfortunately, no. While much has been withheld from us there are basic physical processes that are well understood.

Anonymous ID: d628f1 March 30, 2022, 2:01 p.m. No.15978573   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15978494

Solar flares and CMEs can be exciting and dangerous. Pole reversals not so much, although losing our magnetic field or a reduction in strength of our magnetic field could certainly be problematic. I believe there may be a periodic mechanism impacting life on earth (the old 'Nemesis' hypothesis explored the periodicity of extinction events) but I don't find a pole reversal after a typical solar flare to be sufficiently threatening.