>https://www.zerohedge.com/political/transcript-michael-sussmann-hearing
Someone is lying. The hearing was on the 30th.
>>15993966, >>15994083, >>15994098, >>15994104 REMINIDER POST - SUSSMANN HEARING TODAY WITH DURHAM April 1st 2022!!!
Great, but this is in notables as taking place today and it happened 2 days ago.
Notetaker are you the one that wrote the hearing was April 1?
My concern is someone did this yesterday too… made it look like the hearing was yesterday. That's all.
Tracy Beanz did a good summary of the hearing with a slightly different take on the Dark To Light podcast today.
Said the judge didn't seem interested in anything Sussman's team was trying to do.
https://radioinfluence.com/2022/04/01/dark-to-light-sussman-running-out-of-time/
when has she ever whored YOU for her attention?
When has she ever posted anything that had to be retracted?
No Flynn, no digital soldiers…
I mean you're just trying to be honest with me, but I'm honestly shocked at the gymnastics in some anons' brains.
to each his own I guess…
damn though.
Turning in early tonight.
Goodnight frens.
Own research is okay, but accuracy is a must. I'll take an accurate attention whore over humble inaccuracy. It's vital for my own research.
What's it like letting the success of others control your feelz this way, anon?
Can you show us on this bingo card where Tracy Beanz hurt you?
She's a fren so i can't say i agree
Cool as a cucumber… I'm not the one that get's triggered by the success of others. I've always been the one that has to deal with people like you. I can't imagine what it'd be like in your shoes.
All the fucking time. That wasn't muh point. My point is accuracy is the most important thing for me when I do muh own research. Notables are no exception. It's critical we do all we can to pump out accurate notables to the best of our ability. Doesn't mean they have to be true or reputable even… the information must be accurate. Spelling matters. Dates matter. etc.
It's okay anon.
Everything is going to be alright.
it's not your fault.
Really.
It's not your fault.
our job is to get open-source intelligence aggregated to the best of our ability. We cannot control the accuracy of fake news.
It's amazing how people get so caught up in trying to make their point they forget that 1/3 of what Q posted was fake news purposefully picked to teach us.
When did I namefag, anon?
Baker
>>15993966 has a wrong date. It should be reposted with the right date. The hearing was on 3/30
I'll never let rrn into notables when I'm baking. You have your points to make and I have mine. When we can debate in a meaningful way I'm happy to engage…we're getting off track though.
So you really didn't have anything meaningful to contribute. Here's a parting gift from General Flynn. Important note about local action.
;)
Help me see how I'm wrong about what we do here. Are you a baker?
Is accuracy not important here?
Or do you just feel like being combattive tonight?
Neither
not the OP, the noter, or the baker.
I don't care how it's resolved, honestly; just don't want something in there saying a hearing that took place on 3/30 was on 4/1.
baking is a responsibility and we have guidelines.
okay mr non-combative, when I say our/we I'm obviously not referring to you.
You're obviously not with me.
Problem solved?
You can't make me not have a connection to QR. You don't have that power over me.