I've been trying to do me, chief. No disrespect… yet… but if I'm following your logic the boards would look something like this…
"Let's fucking goooooo!!!!!!!"
"What's this let's shit? Why are you including me?"
Is this really what you're upset about?
I mean I'm not quite ready to say you're obviously high or full of shit or both but I'm getting close.
>We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here.
So many "we's". How dare they?!
Nice try faggot. This isn't about the fucking notable. IT's about me being told I can't say we, so when you're done sucking my cock, go make me a sammich.
WEagree on something
I'll drink to that
Even if I wasn't a baker talking about notables I'd still feel the same way about this. When I'm baking (or when I'm not) those areour notables
I care about what goes in them. I'm sorry that you don't have the same connection to them I do. The whole argument seems stupid to me, but I can't stop you from feeling the way you do… I'll never agree with you, though.
How can I add "feeling connected to QR makes you a communist" to the bingo card, anons?
You feel however you want when you bake.
Can't stop you.
When I bake I serve at the pleasure of Anons. They're not my notables, they're OUR notables. You can't change that. Of course i have final say, but it's not about me. it's about US.
>if someone else see's fit to edit MY notables after I have baked them
now MY work product has been edited after the fact and without my knowledge
pretty fucked up imho
agree 100% here
I had no idea I was talking to a baker.
That a baker could say this…
or this…
I just lost respect for that baker.
I'm going to go to bed now rather than hang out and figure out which baker had the stones to say this.
Goodnight anons.
Take 2
>quite the interesting vidya description