All of this is complete and utter bullshit. Thanks for pointing that out to us, though!
This. Clockfags take Q out of context to push their slide. Dig the news/tweets to correlate Q crumbs and meme the normies with the truth.
ENJOY THE SHOW
>"Next-gen Social Impact Strategist"
That's like "Dish Cleanliness Engineer" or "Food Delivery Administrator".
>Make the shill list
Good luck with that.
All the clock references have been explained re: Q posts and DJT Tweets using the timestamps/timezone references to correlate corrections and predictions from Q (15, 10, 5, etc) to DJT himself. Your clock is not some Crackerjack Box Prize Secret Code Deciphering Device.
Q and DJT would never put something in place that would predict anything because circumstances can AND OFTEN DO change from one post to the next. How often has Q said "tomorrow" or "next week" only to have mass shootings and fucked up political roadblocks happen? Hence the radio silence from Q. Shills are losing their fucking minds because they know it's happening, and all they have left are attempts at discrediting the movement.
Working backwards to find correlations to obscure data points (seconds here, minutes there, hours later on; no wait dates this time… now we're talking seconds again) is cherry picking nonsense to lead anons down the wrong path. Q isn't obscure. Q gives us clues that lead to LOGICAL conclusions; not cryptic riddles pontificating as stringent pedanticism. Q's message would never work that way, nor has it ever.
Eventually, bakers will be able to get this shit out of the bread.
You obviously weren't reading/participating in the same threads as I, else you'd have learned that the Ad Hominem doesn't work. Anons see right through it.
Excellent collage! I'm not saying that because I made it onto there, but that certainly doesn't hurt.
NICELY DONE!!!
Who am I?
Time's up. I suppose I'm just as anonymous as you, aren't I? Nobody here knows where I'm at, from, facebergs or twatters (if I even have those; which I don't). How could I be famefagging like a Corsi without telling people who I am?
Your comments regarding unity? Some of us here have actually participated in the thread "Q's Call to Civic Nationalism". Have you been there yet? See if you can convince the Nazi's that flamed that place to practice unity.
Let's see:
>Point out clock is broken/doesn't work
>Get attacked
>This is somehow not Ad Hominem
Seriously, keep trying. It's amusing as fuck to watch you all squirm.
If that were true, then Hillary got locked up in November of last year (she didn't). Some things Q wanted to happen didn't, so they adapted the threads to keep us informed in a way that wouldn't expose the plot in its entirety (40/60) each step of the way in order to let them get the job done.
>this is why I think you're not watching: How many clockfaces or clockface symbols and representations of of clock faces has Q posted?
None.
>how many times specifically references a clock
Exactly when Q and telling us to use DJT's twitter to validate Q's authenticity. Not your mythical clock – the clock on the tweets in comparison to Q posts alongside corrections on mispellings with markers. Do you get it yet? No one's falling for your thread-slide clock shit.
>there is an overwhelming preponderance of CLOCK pictures, references and representations, and you think clock has nothing to do with a clock.
Q has not posted a single CLOCK in any of their pictures.
The clock has absolutely ZERO to do with:
HWNDU
Skyking
Planefagging
Pizza
Syrian to ISIS ass-rapings with anon help
THIS here right fucking here is a Non Sequitur. For you to state that everything completely unrelated to your mythical clock proves the clock is valid is the VERY DEFINITION of a Non Sequitur. If the clock itself were valid, logical, didn't require a roadmap of chaos to navigate or understand the nuances of it's ever changing ways of interpretations, or JUST PLAIN FUCKING WORKED, the you wouldn't have to try to vehemently to defend it.
Again, thank you for pointing out everything wrong with it so that anons here can see the truth for themselves.
What's my name, bitch? How can I profit from this? How many followers do I have on the Youtube channel I don't own?
Count how many responses I have in this thread without pictures. I like posting pics of pretty ladies, sure. Doesn't mean I do it every time.
Not an argument.
Not true, "A", and "B", it was actually a Non Sequitur. Pointing it out and claiming that I copied your (incorrect) use of it earlier does not mean I'm in correct. Nor have you STILL brought a valid argument to the table.