Were the cases regarding the people who committed the crimes, or about people who looked at pictures of the crime? Disingenuous headlines push a narrative.
It's not like "approving" the vaxx the day after Biden got "elected" so Biden could issue the vaxx mandate totally wasn't scripted by TPTB.
What a load of dissonant crap.
Be a free-thinker
Go to church
Think for yourself
Rely on the bible
So the defendants didn't commit "child sex-torture", they possessed pictures of someone else committing the torture. Kind of an important distinction.
The people have been shown by the SCOTUS that the mandates are, in fact, constitutional.
We lost.
Nope, just a neutral observer watching liars twist the narrative. Facts matter.
Zionists believe that the Supreme Real Estate Broker, and Creator of the Universe, "deeded" the land of Israel to the followers of a specific religion.
So, in your brainwashed view, The Vatican is God?
So are you! Nanner Nanner Nanner.
That is our system. 6 Catholics and 3 Jews, so 9 Jews, decide what is "constitutional".
There's not a damn thing the average "American" can do to change that reality.
I'm rubber and you're glue
Whatever you say to me
Bounces off and sticks to you!
Plus, you have cooties.
Get the grant writers going. We'll need to study this in-depth, with other people's money.
Everyone is self-guided. Some take the easy road, and follow the script that was written for them. Some take the hard road, and trust themselves.
Yeah, a Evangelist who gets confronted with the truth of their grifting, shilling, dirty Pyramid scheme.
Kenneth Copeland @ (00:33)
The Dark World of Megachurches
https://youtu.be/hTfKpAWkgJY
No wonder (((they))) hate her so much.
Gorsuch was Catholic until deciding to be Anglican…which is just British Catholic.
Without following the prosperity gospel (pyramid scheme) the Vatican could've never built Christianity into the worldwide money cult that it is.
He means the Roman Peace…Pax Romana…where all the slaves submit to their earthly Lords and obey, as commanded.
So many broken Peace Treaties…written by men inspired by "god".
Cross of St. Peter…founder of The Vatican and Supreme Ruler of all Christians and Christianity.
So every cop, lawyer and judges that views the evidence of someone else's crime should get the death penalty too? I'm okay with that.
From the source…
As a result of the manner in which he was crucified, the Church has used the upside down cross (without a corpus, so not a crucifix) to designate Peter, not Christ. The Pope, being the successor of Peter, employs the symbol of the upside down cross as a symbolic reminder of St. Peter’s humility and heroic martyrdom. Unlike an upside down crucifix, which seeks to invert and subvert it’s meaning, there is nothing satanic about an upside down cross.
https://www.catholic.com/magazine/online-edition/the-upside-down-cross-satanic-or-symbolic
So, if you're watching a movie in which someone gets murdered, and you enjoyed the movie, you're a murder and deserve the death penalty? That's some twisted logic.
I agree. The cases which KJB is being excoriated over didn't involve the actual crimes and victims…they involved pictures of the crimes.
All modern Christian denominations descend from Catholicism through schism. The "source" of modern Christianity is the Vatican, which blended Judaism, Paganism, and Jesus myths into a coherent political system for the Roman Empire. I'm not "defending" the idiocy…just pointing out the facts of their "belief system".
Anglican is a schism from Catholicism. Catholic roots…but kneeling to and crowning the Emperor of the Monarch of the British Empire, instead of the Monarch of the Roman Empire.
The Pope sets the crown on the head of catholic monarchs and Catholics bow to them.
The Archbishop of Canterbury (head Anglican) crowns the monarch of the British Empire, and Anglicans (like Baron Trump, and Neil Gorsuch) bow to them.
Think MK Monarch mind control.
Sure, the law is what the law is. But possessing evidence of a crime, is not equal to committing the crime. Conflating the two is the realm of social engineers.
If someone hits your parked car, and runs off, you possess evidence of the crime. Maybe even you have security cam video of the crime. If you share that video, lots of people have evidence of the crime…yet none of them or you is legally responsible for the actions of the hit-and-run driver.
So when a teenage girl uploads noodz to social media, as the creator of CP, she should get the death penalty, right? Being a minor, perhaps her parents should get the death penalty for her "disgusting" actions? Just following your logic.
I don't disagree…but it's a different crime. Is stealing a loaf of bread the same crime as burning down a field of ripe wheat? You are free to be intentionally ignorant of the differences, but your weak arguments are just that…weak.
So if a teenage couple exchange "questionable" pics as minors, and keep them, and then get married, and then go on a honeymoon, and the customs agents find them on their phone as they're heading to Cancun, should the be executed on the spot for posessing CP, or do we still kill their parents?
Indeed, kek.