Anon was pretty amused by the part about Obama and "liberal conspirators".
ah, lawd, they think we stupid.
do you even legalese, man?
I don't think these docs are real and at the same time, I do very distinctly remember Graham's and Kavanaugh's exchange during his confirmation hearings specific to military tribunals, treason, etc.
It was pretty interesting.
I don't think anyone actually believed/believes that Russia was a big deal import for the US, did/do they?
And thank u, Jmax, for an easy resource to save and share. :)
Yes. Pls explain further.
Every time I see gwp posted and noted here, day after day, year after year, anon feel kinda weird about it. Another anon posted this a day or so ago, it was in notes, it resonates with this anon.
https://centerforsecuritypolicy.org/bidens-private-army-and-the-militarization-of-american-politics/
Anons have areas of specialty.
Barking out "learn to bake" as being THE way for an anon to have a meaningful role or even be considered "worthy" of having an opinion is pretty fucked up.
The implication is that this board belongs to bakers and anons are ancillary, rather than the other way around.
It's not about the poster. And bakers do NOT always look at the content.
everyone can see what's up.
I didn't ignore the rest of your reply.
I just didn't see much to respond to. The fuckery? Seen't it since the dillley dilley days.
BO, are you a retard?