>>1600496

The entire propaganda strategy related to the promoted fake perceptions of this board, and /pol/, are clearly revealed in this post. Look at /pol/– controlled by AI that floods it with imbecilic, fake bantz (hence it is rendered entirely ineffective, where it used to ground zero for drops and digging). While this "serious" discussion is reduced almost entirely to fake bickering, exaggerated forms of racism, and every possible variation of fake normie-alienating trope.

The AI is so clumsy, it makes posts like these.

Gaslighting

Why do the bots on this board continually:

1. Simulate stupidity

1. Tell humans that THEY are the source of the stupidity?

Multiple uses:

1. Outsiders assume board is den of stupidity

1. Anons assume they themselves, as a collective, are bad and stupid.

Evil tactics to control discourse, control perception, and hurt the spirit.

Is this board full of petty, crude infighting because anons think this is a game? Because they are so immature that they prioritize meaningless rituals of "chan culture" over creating a productive environment?

Who wants the board to look stupid?

Who wants to discredit dissenters to the global power structure?

Who wants to gaslight the American public?

What are the clowns doing with their supercomputers?

This isn't a game

USE LOGIC

>>1600695

Are the world's problems due to ANY large group of the people?

Or are they due to a very very small group of elites? .

Did boomers get lied to? Did their leaders get killed? Who killed them?

Did black people get lied to? Who killed their leaders?

Should we EVER go along with ANY of the group-hatred attitudes that have been used to divide for decades?

How do you keep people divided?

>>1600736

If this board is controlled by clown AI, would that AI fight tooth and nail at any attempt to question the chaotic conditions here?

If this board is controlled by clown AI, does it matter? Should it just be ignored?

What are the pros and cons of ignoring pervasive AI versus fighting back?

If a normie comes here, what do they see, what do they think? What is our mission ? Who benefits from negative perceptions of this board? Is this a game?

Priorities

What are the clowns doing with their supercomputers? Playing WoW?

After WWII, and furthermore after the cold war, the United States found itself, suddenly, with the greatest power the world had ever seen. It's power dangerous? Who seeks it?

In the mid 20th century, trends moved towards totalitarianism– fascism, communism we know– but in liberal democracies as well.

Did the developments in controlling public perception get forgotten after the sixties? Did the world get

1. More loosely controlled and more honest

Or

1. More tightly controlled and more fake?

How would we know?

Did the huge power of the US make consolidation of control more or less likely?

How powerful are intelligence agencies?

Did plans to control the internet get formed the moment the development emerged?

Is control of the internet greater than it's ever been at this moment?

>>1600902

Does the media control public perception through mockery? Think pizzagate, 9/11, JFK, etc.

Does AI repeat the same methods?

Is this a game? What pretends that it is?

What gaslights humans by faking then, then blaming them, then misrepresenting them?

What are the clowns doing with their supercomputers?

When you have enormous power, what do you DO with it? What has the US done with the greatest power the world has seen?

Who benefited?

American prestige hurt-, who benefits?

American self-image hurt– who benefits?

Does the media consciously decide what issues the public will have on their plate? Has the press almost always, in its history, served as mouthpiece of some interest or another?

If the media is now controlled by gigantic corporations, does that mean it no longer serves interests? Or does it serve gigantic interests? Is there competition among interests to utilize the press when it is all owned by a small group of the ultra-powerful?

The media, in a stable situation, traditionally pacifies public opinion or massages it into unified support of something– is our media uniting or dividing?

Did the right/left noise of the first decade and a half of this century divide? How much did media create of that? Did it suddenly get dropped?

The media traditionally pacifies the masses– if the media actively divided the masses, why?

Do normies assume that right/left hatred is organic? Do they think realistically about the history of the press?

Is the truth reaching them?

>>1601031

Are Gowdy's actions more likely to reflect business-as-usual political maneuvering, or strategic moves in the global struggle for power?

>>1601068

Why would you accept mainstream narrative on pizzagate?

>>1601098

How does George Webb work his magic?