(pb) >>16002333
>Who is AMB Matlock?
>Q's password was Q#Matlock
>Because of Jack Matlock
THEY Divide.
WE Conquer.
Anticipated - human nature.
Anticipated - interruptions by others.
Matlock meant to become PUBLIC.
THIS IS NOT A GAME.
2018-01-06
https://qresear.ch/q-posts/474
[J-Go_dX)-2-8
Everything has meaning.
Who is AMB Matlock?
YES.
/[RR-out][P_pers]
EO_CLASSIFIED_WH[ -6713A]
SIG_con_MAR39sv3665BECD
Q
2018-01-04
https://qresear.ch/q-posts/460
(lb) >>16007127
RE: Unconfirmed: Has Russian army captured U.S Major General Roger L. Cloutier?
[Why was a NATO commander inside Ukraine?]
ACURA ViewPoint Jack F. Matlock, Jr.: Today’s Crisis Over Ukraine
Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, has denied that he has any intention of invading Ukraine. His demand is that the process of adding new members to NATO cease and that in particular, Russia has assurance that Ukraine and Georgia will never be members.
Maybe I am wrong—tragically wrong—but I cannot dismiss the suspicion that [we are witnessing an elaborate charade], grossly magnified by prominent elements of the American media, to serve a domestic political end.
My words, and my voice was not the only one. In 1997, when the question of adding more members to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), I was asked to testify before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. In my introductory remarks, I made the following statement: “I consider the Administration’s recommendation to take new members into NATO at this time misguided.
If it should be approved by the United States Senate, it may well go down in history as the most profound strategic blunder made since the end of the Cold War. Far from improving the security of the United States, its Allies, and the nations that wish to enter the Alliance, it could well encourage a chain of events that could produce the most serious security threat to this nation since the Soviet Union collapsed.”
So far as Ukraine is concerned, U.S. intrusion into its domestic politics was deep—to the point of seeming to select a prime minister. It also, in effect, supported an illegal coup d’etat that changed the Ukrainian government in 2014, a procedure not normally considered consistent with the rule of law or democratic governance. The violence that still simmers in Ukraine started in the “pro-Western” west, not in the Donbas where it was a reaction to what was viewed as the threat of violence against Ukrainians who are ethnic Russian.
Well, as I have suggested earlier, maybe this is just an expensive charade.
14 Feb 22
https://ccisf.org/u-s-ambassadorjack-matlock-todays-crisis-over-ukraine/
Finally, on Monday, July 16, 2018, the Helsinki Summit bringing together Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump took place, despite shrill demands that it be stopped, canceled, or turned into a platform for more aggression.
Repeatedly we have been instructed that all of the US’ intelligence agencies concluded that there was significant Russian interference in the US elections of 2016. First, it would be useful to consult the resources on Russiagate compiled on Fabius Maximus. Second, it is important to remember that: “The intelligence community as a whole has not been tasked to make a judgment and some key members of that community did not participate in the report that is routinely cited as ‘proof’ of ‘Russian interference’,” as explained in careful detail by Jack Matlock, a veteran of government service with experience on national security matters at the highest levels.
https://zeroanthropology.net/2018/07/17/the-helsinki-summit-trying-to-turn-the-page-on-the-new-cold-war/
Prominent American journalists and politicians seized upon this shabby, politically motivated, report as proof of “Russian interference” in the U.S. election without even the pretense of due diligence. They have objectively acted as co-conspirators in an effort to block any improvement in relations with Russia, even though cooperation with Russia to deal with common dangers is vital to both countries.
https://ccisf.org/former-ambassador-jack-matlock-speaks-out-on-russian-interference/