>>1601509
The "Jack The Ripper" document opens with this bombshell:
>Jack the Ripper: a live machine of intent consisting of human organization in absence of conscience? Under influence of the Monarchies, to psychopathically murder under particular guidelines & for particular purposes with police agreement to succeed?
>It seems that a “Jack the Ripper” forms & occurs when a number of persons in the authorities want to dispose of someone for whatever purpose, send organized instruction through their hidden contacts within the general citizens & public services to work together as a group methodically & secretly to target & destroy. No one seems to know where it comes from, seems like bad luck when targeted or witnessing events because it gives a feeling of to come from everywhere & nowhere simultaneously or in a particular order or sequence, before & after the fact, to make cause & a predetermined effect.
>Investigators always look for one perpetrator, not an organized group. “Jack the Ripper” is a group of people however organized who each agree to play a role before, during & after, in organization to make an altered appearance of cause & effect to a targeted persons life. Each of the group that has contact with the person, directly or indirectly, agrees to do something that ought not to be done or not to do something that ought to be done for the agreed intent of creating a cause for the purpose of effect, not always being murder.
>The results could be that a teenager has disappeared or child abducted (organs?), there is an apparent suicide, false staged arrests (incarseration is an alternate method of disposal – to get someone dispensed with), a car accident with weird details that don’t add up, a mugging / murder, a drowning, an overdose or the name sake of Ripper to cut. It seems to me, now a days, in criminal organization, that the “methods of disposal” rotate to melt in with normal & random statistics of occurrences to not create a “spike” in some way that would allert the public as the events labelled “Jack the Ripper” did.
>For a “Jack the Ripper” to happen there would need to be a member of the group at each of the pertinant policing, witnessing & authority contact points of the matters to be in agreement to misdirect the evidence as the matters unfold & to continue to cover it up after the fact. When a Jack the Ripper happens, in my experience, it is an issue of harm “to pounce” by a group upon an unsuspecting target, where the police are in agreement, carrying out or facilitating to allow the crime to occur in a concealed & misinforming manner.