“It’s Beyond ANY Shadow of a Doubt That the Vaccines Are Causing LARGE NUMBERS of Deaths”: Dr. Peter McCullough

Death inevitably follows pandemics, and it has been especially prevalent throughout the past two years, thanks to the Fauci-funded genetically modified virus that escaped from the Wuhan Lab in late 2019.

Despite the mass rollout of a vaccine, in which the majority of the population was compelled into taking the jab, excess deaths in the US remain at all-time highs over a year after the “cure” was introduced, and the numbers continue to get worse – especially for young Americans.

All while deaths from Covid itself are bottoming out.

So what is going on? The majority of people have taken their jabs, the virus has a 99.95-99.99% recovery rate for most, and Fauci himself said last month that we are moving out of the pandemic phase. What gives?

Well, according to Dr. Peter McCullough, the most published Cardiologist in history, the answer is unequivocally clear: the spike in death, which perfectly coincides with the rollout of the experimental jab, is the obvious culprit.

“It’s beyond any shadow of a doubt that the vaccines are causing a large number of deaths,” McCullough proclaimed in a recent interview with the ‘On a Mission Podcast.’

Can’t put it any clearer than that.

McCullough, who’s also an epidemiologist, isn’t just spouting off wild baseless claims. He explained his reasoning behind his shocking conclusion by walking through the “Bradford Hill Tenants of Causality,” in order to demonstrate the link between the vaccines and the current wave of excess deaths.

The Bradford Hill Tenants are widely considered to be the standard when evaluating cause and effect. It is regularly used in public health research and is defined as “a group of nine principles that can be useful in establishing epidemiologic evidence of a causal relationship between a presumed cause and an observed effect, according to Wikipedia.

From McCullough:

“I’m an epidemiologist, and people have asked me: ‘Dr. McCullough, are the vaccines actually causing deaths?’

The epidemiological construct that we have to go through is called the ‘Bradford Hill Tennants of Causality.’ So, the first question is: ‘is it a large epidemiologic signal?’ And I’ll tell you – it’s astronomical. All of the vaccines combined in the United States per year – its no more than 150 deaths, not temporally related.

Here [with the Covid vaccine] we are at over 21,000 deaths. So clearly its a massive signal.

Number two: ‘is there a dangerous mechanism of action?’ The answer is yes. We know the vaccines have a dangerous mechanism of action – they install production of the spike protien. The spike protein is what makes the respiratory infection lethal, and it follows that in some people excessive production of the spike protein in a vulnerable person would be lethal after a vaccine.

The third criteria: ‘is it internally consistent? Are there other conditions that are now acknowledged that they themselves could be fatal?’ And the answer is sure. With myocarditis, the FDA agrees – all the regulatory experts agree – that the vaccines cause myocarditis. Can it be fatal? Yes. Have there been fatal cases published? Yes… There are over 200 peer reviewed publications of myocarditis.

How about other forms of death? vaccine induced thrombosis, blood clots, stroke, hypertension, myocardial infection – a variety of other lethal syndromes. There’s over 1,000 peer reviewed published on fatal and non fatal outcomes [in regard to the Covid vaccine]. So that cryteria is met. It’s internally consistent.

After briefly running through the rest of the tenants, McCullough sums it up and doesn’t pull any punches.

“I’ve just gone through the exercise – “it is beyond any shadow of a doubt that the vaccines are causing large numbers of deaths,” McCullough concludes. “It’s unequivocal, and I’m a card-carrying epidemiologist. I’m telling you, the vaccines are causing large numbers of deaths,” he repeated with emphasis.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/04/beyond-shadow-doubt-vaccines-causing-large-numbers-deaths-dr-peter-mccullough-video/

Exxon Says Q1 2022 Profits Could Be $2 Billion More Than Q4 2021

After the bell on Monday, Exxon told investors in a filing that its first quarter profits could wind up exceeding $9 billion, mainly helped along by the rising price of oil.

The company said that between $1.9 billion and $2.3 billion in fourth quarter profit was due to the change in the price of crude. It also estimated about $400 million in additional profit as a result of gas-price changes.

The company said its filing was to offer “perspective” about market and other “planned factors” about its upcoming quarterly report, expected toward the end of the month. It warned that these figures were not an estimate, MarketWatch pointed out.

The company noted that Q1 results could have been as much as $2 billion higher than Q4 2021, when the company posted earnings of $8.8 billion.

But the company's massive earnings don't come without potential risks, as Bloomberg noted Monday. Those risks include Democrats in the House who are looking for oil companies to "immediately halt dividends and share buybacks until the war’s conclusion" in Ukraine.

Politicians have been scolding oil and gas companies for a number of things that the industry had no hand in, including prices rising due to the war, prices rising due to the U.S.'s constrained supply of oil and alleged "profit gouging" that is simply margin expansion as a result of higher output pricing.

The same politicians that fail to understand the basic economics behind the industry are also in the midst of trying to figure out a way to bring oil prices lower. President Biden warned last week of "of punishing financial penalties for companies slow-walking projects involving federally owned oil prospects," Bloomberg wrote.

Democrats took out their ire on Exxon and three other explorers for spending $44 billion on buybacks and dividends last year. We guess politicians won't be happy until the companies go back to running at massive losses, like they did after the government shut down the economy at the onset of Covid.

House Oversight Committee Chair Carolyn B. Maloney and Environment Subcommittee Chair Ro Khanna are leading the charge against the oil industry.

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/exxon-says-q1-2022-profits-could-be-2-billion-more-q4-2021-late-day-monday-filing

Maya Wiley: Republicans Voting Against KBJ Sends Message You’re ‘Not Good Enough’ to Black People

Civil rights activist Maya Wiley said Monday on MSNBC’s “The ReidOut” that she believes Republican senators who voted against confirming judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to the U.S. Supreme Court sent a message to black people that it did not matter “what you do, you will not be good enough.”

Host Joy Reid said, “Long term, do you foresee any of these men regretting having landed in the history books on the wrong side of history saying, ‘We will deny this black woman. We don’t want this black woman on the court. We don’t have a reason for it.’ She has the same lack of judicial philosophy John Roberts testified to when he was running. He said I don’t have a judicial philosophy. They didn’t have a problem with that. Do you think ultimately, in the history books, do you think they’ll care they come down on the Dixiecrat side of history here?”

Wiley said, “I will say this. I certainly hope so. I certainly hope they understand, as people elected to the Senate who went and took an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States and frankly stand up and serve this democracy, that they understand exactly what happened here was not only the attack on a black woman qualified for this job, sending a message by the way to black people across this country that it doesn’t matter what you do. That was the message. It doesn’t matter what you do. You will not be good enough. Wrong message for pluralist democracy, but they also sent the message that said anybody who has an interest in rising in your profession and in your career on the Federal bench, you better meet our ideological litmus test. It is not something that’s okay. The third branch of government, the federal judiciary, is supposed to be an independent one. They attacked that today.”

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2022/04/04/maya-wiley-republicans-voting-against-kbj-sends-message-youre-not-good-enough-to-black-people/

French Jew killed by tram likely a target of antisemitic attack, family says

Jeremy Cohen, 31, was killed two months ago in what police deemed a traffic accident

https://www.timesofisrael.com/french-jew-killed-by-tram-likely-a-target-of-antisemitic-attack-family-says/

DPRK Says Will Have to Use Nuclear Weapons if South Korea Mounts Pre-Emptive Attack - Kim Yo Jong

North Korea has possessed nuclear weapons since 2006, which it says are necessary to guarantee its safety in the absence of a permanent peace treaty and US withdrawal from Korea. The US and its allies claim North Korean nuclear weapons are destabilizing to the region and a danger to the South.

Kim Yo Jong, the Deputy Department Director of the Publicity and Information Department of the Workers' Party of Korea, said on Monday that if South Korea followed through on recent threats of a preemptive strike against the North, Pyongyang would reply with nuclear weapons.

"In case South Korea opts for military confrontation with us, our nuclear combat force will inevitably have to carry out its duty," Kim said in remarks carried by Korean Central News Agency (KCNA).

However, she cautioned that "South Korea is not our principal enemy" and that the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) is "definitely against such war."

"That's why our Marshal clarified that our principal enemy is just war itself," she said, referring to her older brother, DPRK leader Kim Jong Un.

"However, the South Korean Army, labeling us as enemy, talked about the possibility of mounting a preemptive strike on us with such a premise as in certain circumstances. Such nonsense itself is a very dangerous and nasty expression," Kim Yo Jong added. "If anyone does not provoke us, we will never strike it before anything else."

Kim's remarks come several days after South Korean Defense Minister Suh Wook made rare public comments about Seoul's preemptive strike doctrine against North Korea.

"Currently, our military possesses large numbers and various types of missiles that have greatly improved in terms of ranges, accuracy and power, and it has capabilities to accurately and swiftly strike any targets in North Korea," Suh said at an April 1 ceremony marking the reinforcement of the Army Missile Strategic Command in Wonju, according to Yonhap News Agency.

Kim previously commented on Suh's "absurd remarks" on Sunday, calling them "reckless" and saying it was indicative of "confrontation frenzy against the DPRK."

https://sputniknews.com/20220404/dprk-says-will-have-to-use-nuclear-weapons-if-south-korea-mounts-pre-emptive-attack—kim-yo-jong-1094482719.html