>>16018577 pb

I don’t know, but you can’t get sick enough to help the sick or be poor enough to help the poor. One can accomplish a lot moar when one has money. So that spiritual leader prolly ain’t that great being that God wants to bless us with abundance. There’s no virtue in poverty nor is there any virtue in denying God’s desires He put in our heart. A real spiritual leader would teach people how to THRIVE and attain their biggest dreams because when ye seek the Kingdom of God then ALL is added unto you. Riches, health and well being MUST FLOW IN. IT IS GOD’S LAW. God wants to bless us, the loser Ferdinand would have you believe here’s virtue in poverty but there ain’t none.

Then here’s Elon Musk encouraging people to live like sardines in a can instead of teaching them how to reach for the stars and THRIVE. You know why? His success is fake and rigged. God didn’t bless him with it, they have to lie, cheat n steal it from us. It may be easier for a camel to go thru the eye of a needle, but once you find the Kingdom of God, the wealth MUST FLOW.

ELON MUSK IS A TRANSHUMANIST, GLOBALIST, LUCIFERIAN POSthat said we must blend with artificial intelligence or it may kill us.

His ex gf he says he still loves n is close with is a LUCIFERIAN pos too, so is his mother, n so is his new gf now, who stars in horror movies such as one called The Pale Door. I have a video on the way. People are so easily seduced.

>>16018691 (me)

Not loser Ferdinand, Kmao.. it was supposed to say *loserferians

>>16018705

Erm…this POS WANTS US DEAD.Wanting mass genocide to serve the devil is not a “fault” that other Anons have. You should prolly learn to VALUE YOUR LIFE MOAR n maybe grow a backbone. ALL THESE MOTHER FUCKERS NEED TO BE EXECUTED BY OUR MILITARY. There HAS to be ACCOUNTABILITY. ( Not yelling but emphasizing because bold doesn’t work from this mobile device.)

Holeeeee shit.. the jars.. these people are not right.

CRISPR cracks open the door to a future of human mutants. Worried?

In November 2018, Hong Kong’s Le Méridien Cyberport hotel became the epicenter of controversy about Jiankui He, a Chinese researcher who was staying there when a journalist revealed he had created the world’s first “edited” babies. Select experts were gathering in the hotel for the Second International Summit on Human Genome Editing—a meeting that had been called to deliberate about the future of the human species. As CNN called the experiment “monstrous,” as heated discussions took place in labs and living rooms around the globe, He sat uncomfortably on a couch in the lobby.

He was trying to explain himself to Jennifer Doudna, the chemist at UC Berkeley, who is one of the pioneers behind CRISPR, a new genetic-engineering tool. Doudna had predicted that CRISPR would be used to direct the evolution of our species,* writing, “We possess the ability to edit not only the DNA of every living human but also the DNA of future generations.” As He went through his laboratory protocol, describing how he had manipulated the genes of freshly fertilized human eggs with CRISPR, Doudna shook her head. She knew that this moment might be coming someday, but she imagined that it would be in the far future.

https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2021/02/11/crispr-cracks-open-the-door-to-a-future-of-human-mutants-worried/

>>16018929

25 February 2022

How to protect the first ‘CRISPR babies’ prompts ethical debate

In 2018, the world learned that He had implanted embryos in which he had used

CRISPR–Cas9 to edit a gene known asCCR5, which encodes an HIV co-receptor,with the goal of making them resistant to the virus. The implantation led to the birth of twins in 2018, and a third child was later born to separate parents. The parents had agreed to the treatment because the fathers were HIV-positive and the mothers were HIV-negative, and the couples were barred from access to alternative assisted-reproduction technologies in China.

In December 2019, He was sentenced to three years in prison. Sources close to him say that he should be released soon. Qiu says he might be assigned a research position.

Eben Kirksey, a medical anthropologist at Alfred Deakin Institute in Melbourne, Australia, who has written a book on human genome-editing1, agrees that He should shoulder some responsibility for the children. He promised that they would receive health insurance for the first 18 years of their lives, but because the twins were born prematurely, they were initially denied coverage, which He initially stepped in to pay, according to Kirksey’s investigations. He and the university should make good on promises of medical assistance, Kirksey says.

The children, who are now toddlers, are the only known children with edited genomes. It is possible that others have been born since, but Qiu says that this is unlikely to have happened in China, where researchers would have been deterred by He’s harsh punishment. “No scientist will dare to further cross the line,” he says.

But other researchers have stated their interest in implanting genome-edited embryos, including Denis Rebrikov, a molecular biologist and geneticist at the Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology in Moscow. He has developed a technique to use CRISPR to edit mutations in a gene linked to deafness, called GJB2, but he has yet to implant a genome-edited embryo owing to a lack of interest among deaf couples in Russia. “I am sure that sooner or later we will find a couple who want to give birth to a hearing child,” says Rebrikov. When he does, he plans to edit the embryos and store them before requesting permission from Russian regulatory bodies to implant them.

The three children in China “will not be the last” babies with edited genomes, says Ayo Wahlberg, an anthropologist specializing in reproductive technologies at the University of Copenhagen.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-00512-w