It is not clear that BO is in the business of cutting back on that sort of thing. Quite the contrary, in fact. He sends to have an innate gift for allowing the maximum conceivable quantity of garbage to remain in the bread.
What's your name?
The overall effect of the 1. flurries of controversial banning, followed by 2. long periods of zero bans, justified by 1, implies a clever game, not a valid practice. Think about what a false flag is. IMO
The point of the game is to give AI a cover to run free by artificially getting the board to go along with a no bans policy.
This has been iterated cyclically a few times, always with half-baked speeches about censorship, which are totally irrelevant when faced with AI power.
Your attitude must isn't realistic. This isn't a game. If you were a normal human, you would at least be understanding about being questioned, and accommodate such requests by being as forthcoming as possible, given all that is at stake.
Do you think that the clowns aren't trying to get control? This isn't a game.
x xxxx yy xC yy
xx Ayyyy xxxx
xxxxxx N
yyyy xx Yxxx
Oyy xxxxyy
x U yyyy xx
xxx y y Rx xxx
xxxyy E yx
xAxxxx
yyyyyxx D yy x
this BO?
Is it important for you that you can?
If we can have stickies about fake "airs of doubt surrounding Q", I don't see why a good-natured Turing test or two is out of order. Be a sport!
Well congratulations. It appears you may be a bit more sophisticated than our dear BO…
BO is in the middle of a Turing test. Please do not disturb. Thank you.
Let's just let BO pass the Turing test, then see where we're at. No reason not to be vigilant.
>I can read, asswipe.
Can you read what I posted though? That was the question– not if you could read in general. Lol. Thanks man.
I know which one this is. You go by H__(…) on that other forum, don't you?