Anonymous ID: 9f7176 April 6, 2022, 4:02 a.m. No.16022221   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://www.bitchute.com/video/s78zCidZE5yL/

 

HOW TO JUKE A NUKE

 

This here is fascinating.

Smartphones, the mRNA shot, "nuke a city", movies "color out of space", movie "Annihilation"

Anonymous ID: 9f7176 April 6, 2022, 4:32 a.m. No.16022312   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2332

>>16022298

>it's a video

>that means it's historic and true, and can't be faked

Could have been a fake movie made by Hollywood.

 

Although granted tons of German civilians were indeed killed. It's all only controlled at the top. A regular soldier does not matter.

Anonymous ID: 9f7176 April 6, 2022, 4:34 a.m. No.16022318   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2332

>>16022298

And the Nazis at the RKI (Germany's CDC) weren't hung either.

RKI wasn't closed down despite doing all sorts of medical experiments on prison / camp inmates.

 

Weird, isn't it.

Anonymous ID: 9f7176 April 6, 2022, 4:41 a.m. No.16022338   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2364 >>2368

>>16022265

Sure, but who do you identify validity of claims?

 

For example one says "covid is the flu".

Now tons of "experts" say that's wrong and covid is totally real and totally deadly.

 

Who decides now?

Can everyone vote?

Then one will just create 1 million bots who all vote that covid is real.

 

"agree/disagree buttons" - so the majority is supposed to decide on what's true and what's not?

 

I don't think such a thing can work, especially not on a compromised network.

Even if everyone would have to be verified, governments can just create shill accounts and verify them.

 

When everything is compromised, you can't really do much.

Anonymous ID: 9f7176 April 6, 2022, 4:53 a.m. No.16022391   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2409

>>16022368

>trust source

There are no trusted sources.

And my own? Who am I in the end?

 

Again: all you are doing is going for mob truth, which is not actual truth.

 

And let's say you create a system were people are labelled more trustworthy the more trustworthy stuff they post. Okay, fine. But once again, someone with basically unlimited resources can easily create bots that vote another up. You can't really do a thing about these. and they will be considered trustworthy, despite that not being the case.

 

>Bots get ignored in this setting, it is much too complicated for them to be relevant.

What?

One can easily cheat your system using bots. And well, one can also cheat your system just by using corrupt "experts".

 

Take a look at covid. The experts are dumb fucks, who just follow along. The expert said, so it must be true. That's how most people work and that's while your system would not work. You think everyone is critical like you, but they aren't, that's why covid worked so well.