oop
chk and vogue
sneaky
So this is what is going on:
In Camera Inspection Law and Legal Definition
In Camera inspection happens when a judge reviews evidence (depositions, documents, photos and the like) to determine whether it should be provided to other parties. This usually occurs when both sides in a case disagree about whether a certain, usually crucial piece of evidence should come in, meaning (1) is it admissible-is it relevant to the trier of fact in making a determination of the ultimate issue of the case and (2) is the prejudicial affect to the defendant substantially outweighed by the probative value of the evidence. Any material that is not relevant is not disclosed or may be redacted.
To be entitled to an in camera inspection, the defendant must make a preliminary showing that the sought-after evidence is material to his or her defense. [State v. Shiffra, 175 Wis. 2d 600 (Wis. Ct. App. 1993)]
Durham is fighting for more evidence withheld by Horowitz to be entered in as evidence in the jury trial against Sussman for the jury to view as part of the evidence in the case? I might not be understanding this correctly.