>>160511
They don’t always have brackets involved. Go back and read crumbs and look at previous “markers”. First reference to markers was around 11/1 or 11/2 saying 11/3 will show confirmation of marker....
>>160511
They don’t always have brackets involved. Go back and read crumbs and look at previous “markers”. First reference to markers was around 11/1 or 11/2 saying 11/3 will show confirmation of marker....
There are double meanings everywhere. 15 10 5 0 markers doesn’t mean there aren’t other clues or patterns dealing with timestamps involved outside of the 5 highlighted.
Yes. I by no means have it figured out, but I think I at least get the general premise of it. I think people make the mistake of thinking all Q posts are in real time order. Some may be, but some aren’t. There’s an underlining pattern/code.
Not visible ones anyways. We can only speculate at this point.
Don’t confuse the map with the graphic. Two different things. Graphic, as Q has confirmed at different times throughout this exercise, is the chronological order of Q posts (and those he is responding to in Q posts) are the graphic. The map is it be figured out.
“Whoever controls the office of the Presidecy controls this great land.”
Nice. I’ll have to use these. I find when you include a quote like this before you start with the red pill info in social media posts, people tend to be more open to what you’re trying to say as opposed to just throwing dropping big info at random times.