>>160519
Wrong board. no one here will be offended
>Q team just has to open this board and shake it's head every day. They have given us all we need to paint a rough picture of what has happened and none of us are trying to complete the picture which is the point morons. They can't tell us everything for a number of reasons but i promise you they have given us all we need to piece it all together. Shut the hell up about Soros, yes he's bad but he's an arrend boy. Q has eluded to this. He has told us what groups comprise the head of this snake and it appears you all want to research everyone but them because it's a little challenging. They created this board to have us piece together the picture knowing they couldn't tell us the whole thing.
Part 1, mostly agreed (I'd laugh instead of shake my head), up until…
>We are letting them down, believe that. If you haven't fully read the drops and arent researching the crumbs Q team has left for us to work on get the hell out of here or at the very least quit posting. You are hurting the cause and embarrassing yourself.
Disagree, I'm proud of our progress for what it is & FWIW. We've been told so as well.
>AT&T>No Such Agency [contract].
>AT&T>GOOG/FB/etc. 'prevent unfair censorship' PUSH.
I think it's safe to say that the companies which fall under under
>@Jack, MZ, ES, JB, EM, SH, MSM
are in the process of being brought under heel. AT&T is just an arm bein gused to roll out the process, IMO. Not only are the corrupt heads of FB, Goog, etc, being dealt with as their #s come up, the cultures w/in their companies, minus clown influence, should shift DRASTICALLY over the next few years. May take some time to get run of the mill employees on board bc of what they're used to, yet, the shift will come, and open dialogue, more neutral search engines, more rural access to broadband, will give people a more prominent voice in America, as it should be w/o the default censorship.
>Not convinced this is spreading?
It is, and will spread even more
>You, the PEOPLE, have THE POWER.
>You, the PEOPLE, just forgot how to PLAY.
Bc we've been playing by (((their))) rules. Our turn.
NO!
And, even if that was true, why the hell would you broadcast it?
Friendly remind these nuts
>I'm only referring to the research side. It has fallen off and we have all of the picture we need. We should be focusing on what we have already found out
100% correct. I mean, no classroom ever sticks to the course 100% because, well, humans. Still, I think we've accomplished quite a bit with the research that actually has occurred, even with the (relative) fun being had. Myself, I've been rereading the crumbs to see how they fit together, not just with current events, but with one another. thus far, I see no contradictions that shouldn't be there (disinfo is necessary), and that in itself is telling. We all have our purpose here, even those that have the purpose to distract, makes for a stronger focus & sense of purpose for those not distracted. We'll get there, I'm sure of it, even in the midst of the fuckery. I mean, it WAS the most fuckery corner of the internet chosen so….
>10 days of darkness is 10 days with no FB, Twatter, etc.
Pros.
…while they reboot into less censored shitty versions of themselves, that'd be nice. AND, would kinda force people to actually talk to one another.
aligns with the offline storage too, bc we can still show the proofs to the people w/o social media that way.
Con:
Might hurt businesses & brands that depend on them, hopefully would work in their log-term benefit as well. As long as they have an actual website, should be ok…
I'm not against the idea, however i don't want to say for sure that it'll be a thing
>>160789 (bows), thank you!!!
True. Right now (((they))) still control their narrative, so to speak. And need to get/keep as many under (((their))) Fantasyland spell as possible. Yet, once the spell is broken, it'll stay broken (cut the head off the snake…)
line upon line, precept upon precept
>Not convinced this is spreading?
GS = just one piece to the puzzle. A huge piece, still, just one piece, he bleeds too. When his influence starts to wane we'll know for sure.
Hmmmmm, has to be played carefully. Could be successful though. We shall see.
KEK
Grammar police, get cuffs on Q ASAP!
why this obsession? DID YOU NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT Q SAID/MEANT, OR DID YOU?
01/18/18 (Thu) 23:04:38 No.37
The TELL.
How can we listen in, track, and monitor American citizens [bad actors]?
[We hear you].
[We see you].
…
Why is this relevant?
Who can we TRUST?
Expand your thinking.
Answer?:
GCHQ