Anonymous ID: dfa25e Jan. 25, 2018, 2:18 p.m. No.161230   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>161172

ive yet to see peoples skin fall off due to "chem trails".

 

But i have seen the patents and the tech for cloud seeding thats been around since 1901. So thats the extent of my knowledge on this topic.

 

There could be chem trails, there could not be chem trails, so far ive only seen evidence for cloud seeding but im not closed to the belief that the same tech could be used for something more dastardlyโ€ฆ ive just not seen evidence for it yet.

Anonymous ID: dfa25e Jan. 25, 2018, 2:26 p.m. No.161283   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>161224

>>161237

>>161213

 

>Referring to 1903, 1915, 1919, 1944, and 1947 weather modification experiments, the Australian Federation of Meteorology discounted "rainmaking".

 

Cant specificaly find the 1903 patent on Google Patents again, but if u can find it and make any finds based off it, then go ahead.

Anonymous ID: dfa25e Jan. 25, 2018, 2:32 p.m. No.161322   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>161286

re: Cloud seeding/chem trails

Yes i do think there is a difference. One has been known to be around since 1903 experiments on trying to cause ions in the atmosphere to clump certain molecules, and another is a topic that is barely covered outside 'conspiracy' circles.

 

Not saying its a conspiracy in the sense of 'hurr durr its a conspiracy dood, its not real, lol its not science', just the fact that the knowledge of it isnt well circulated enough for a lot of people, myself included, to be completely convinced its what people constantly claim.

 

I wouldnt discount that the same tech could be used for nefarious means at all so im waiting on the evidence for chemtrails in the sense you specify before i make my final judgement.