Anons you find all docs on Durham’s investigation here, can we put this someone for anons to research from?
Durham is Coming
@Durham_isComing
Russiagate Research Links For EveryoneLinktree
@RyanM58699717
Permanently banned on twitter, but not stopped.
https://linktr.ee/RyanM58699717
Threadreader on Dr. Margot Clevelands great analysis on
BREAKING: Sussmann's files motion to bar government's expert witness.
Her conclusion is Sussman is going to fail hugely on his arguments, because his argument contradicts himself and others
10/10 what expert is to testify on (but that would only be in response to Sussmann presenting evidence it was accurate); 4) failed to give enough detail on opinion of expert. If I were government, I'd supplement w/ more detail, but not sure how that sorts out.
Continuing re Gov't Notice: This puts Sussmann in corner. If he claims he shared out of national security concern, that implies it is authentic. And then gov't pounces. Not it isn't that it "was" fabricated–but the "possibility." Possible Plausible amirite? 1/
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1512537214844026884.html
I think I’ve seen other tricks that will get them all too
Durham is Coming
@Durham_isComing
Durham was a GENIUS for deciding to only prosecute Sussman for the false statementcharge because no one else shares liability for that particular act. This way, clinton, joffe, and others cannot claim a 'common defense' with sussman bc they didnt make the lie. GENIUS!!
11:37 AM · Apr 7, 2022·Twitter Web App
GeorgetownJD
@GeorgetownJD
Replying to
@Durham_isComing
Clinton, Joffe, and others don't need a "common defense" defense. They haven't been charged. There is nothing for them to raise "common defense" against.
1:11 PM · Apr 7, 2022·Twitter Web App
Durham is Coming
@Durham_isComing
Replying to
@GeorgetownJD
exactly! which is why Durham was so smart to keep this indictment against sussman painfully limited to the one act of lying. by doing so, look how much information has been unearthed and made public, which also guarantees the survival of durhams investigation.
1:21 PM · Apr 7, 2022·Twitter Web App
Durham is Coming Retweeted
Brian Carlin
@BrianCa03392513
Replying to
@Durham_isComing
and
@GeorgetownJD
I think you're right. He used Sussmann to pull on the threads a bit on the overall conspiracy. He's establishing clear bread crumb trail that he can later wrap up in 2 to 4 separate 18USC371 cases involving dozens of BHO Admin critters.
3:34 PM · Apr 7, 2022·Twitter Web App
https://twitter.com/Durham_isComing/status/1512118355561439243?s=20&t=_CLh_T_ww1W6mb5Y8XCbzw
Durham is Coming
@Durham_isComing·Apr 7
Durham is effectively forcing the judge to view the documents withheld by clinton/joffe/Fusion, and to rule that either 1. there is privilege or 2. there is not. If there is not (and there is not) then the docs must be produced. Clinton team has no valid argument
Durham is Coming
@Durham_isComing
.
1:43 PM · Apr 7, 2022·Twitter for Android
Durham is Coming
@Durham_isComing
If anything,” Fusion GPS push for reporters to “hurry” to publish the Alfa Bank tale before resolving questions about its “authenticity” “would itself arguably create significant libel and defamation litigation risk,” the special counsel’s office quipped.
(Is this wear Trump got his idea for part pf his lawsuit accusations?)
thefederalist.com
Will The Court Allow The Special Counsel To See Clinton Documents?
1:38 PM · Apr 7, 2022
https://twitter.com/Durham_isComing/status/1512122547290230795?s=20&t=_CLh_T_ww1W6mb5Y8XCbzw
Thats what i was thinking every J6 prisoner can use the fact the USCP waived them in, in the case the guy killed himself, I think the family has an opportunity for a lawsuit against them and FBI, and what about the elderly grandmother locked up. They should let them all go now that were waived into the capitol and the gov can wait for major class action lawsuits
https://twitter.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/1511894199766958087?s=20&t=_CLh_T_ww1W6mb5Y8XCbzw
Michigan Trial
https://twitter.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/1512845066443755528?s=20&t=_CLh_T_ww1W6mb5Y8XCbzw
https://twitter.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/1512836804801548289?s=20&t=tMQbstq_3He3MHvCFYvE3Q
I think 20% is pretty high, but answering yes with that many may mean there are a lot more federal informants than thought
https://twitter.com/FOOL_NELSON/status/1512521254674305024?s=20&t=tMQbstq_3He3MHvCFYvE3Q
Shipwreck iscalling out to Foia anons to request info on illegal immigrantsgiven smart phones, perhaps someone on twitter can show this to the FOIA anons there, see below
FoiaFan
@15poundstogo
https://mobile.twitter.com/15poundstogo
UndeadFOIA
@UndeadFoia
https://mobile.twitter.com/UndeadFoia
https://twitter.com/UndeadFoia/status/1512976266302873602?s=20&t=kSj4z3a59UxsCPUCq9ACaA
https://twitter.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/1511976831410343943?s=20&t=tMQbstq_3He3MHvCFYvE3Q
Very Helpful: Anon gives tips and instructions on requesting FOIAs
UndeadFOIA@UndeadFoia
Don't be afraid to put in FOIA's!
The law is there for you to find out what the hell is going on.
FOIA's are simple, and there are tons of resources out there on how to do it, and you can learn tons from someone like
@15poundstogo
, just like I did.
Some tips & examples:
Most of the federal government (and state/local entites) are subject to FOIA. You can determine which agency to FOIA pretty easily through google. Organization charts are always a big help.
UndeadFOIA@UndeadFoia
What I've done is to start with documents out there, like my FOIA docs. A starting point are all the people CC'd on interesting emails. If you want to be serious about it, create a spreadsheet and google who they are.
Here is an example. In one email, I noticed Keromytis suggest he needed to speak to the General Counsel of DARPA before speaking to Durham's team.
Quick google search told me that is Crane Lopes. So I FOIA'd that. It'll be a few more weeks, but that should be interesting.
UndeadFOIA
@UndeadFoia
Public reporting on Joffe told me he was a cybersecurity advisor to President Obama. So I FOIA'd that:
Take notice how little detail I include here. Agencies like DHS/DOJ require much more detail.
UndeadFOIA@UndeadFoia
So here we have a response on that, which tells me there are 255 pages and 61 electronic files responsive to that FOIA. Now, even if
@BarackObama
invokes executive privilege to protect this documents, we know there's something here.
UndeadFOIA@UndeadFoia
So there are a couple examples. If you look at social media contacts, or FOIA documents, or public reporting, you can put in interesting FOIA's and move the ball forward.
Might add to this thread a bit.
2:35 PM · Apr 10, 2022·Twitter Web App
https://mobile.twitter.com/UndeadFoia/status/1513224193172652036
Now the DOD involved
Rodney Joffe has a long-standing relationship with the DOD, and now we have issues with the DOD seemingly at center of a major discrepancy around the investigation of the DNC hack.
Interesting.
https://twitter.com/UndeadFoia/status/1511853702830731264?s=20&t=h1KC3hujtxEixTVd1-vG4w
Apparently the Susman Attorney Client Privilege claims is going to go down in fiery flames
FoiaFan
@15poundstogo
About friggin’ time.BTW, opp research and political smears are not legal advice. Neither are they preparing for litigation. Communications for this purpose are not privileged in the first place. Only once privilege is established must it be pierced.
https://twitter.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/1511892262128562176?s=20&t=cmDUnfmuRbrO0Ay6waWCuw
Musk owns 73.5 million shares of twitter. And the new CEO owns 500,000kekkity. No wonder the gushing on how great it was Musk was coming
https://twitter.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/1511247981567127556?s=20&t=cmDUnfmuRbrO0Ay6waWCuw
https://twitter.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/1511037489833668608?s=20&t=cmDUnfmuRbrO0Ay6waWCuw
Browder is a first class criminal anf stole billions from Russia, Oligarchs, and others, he made up the whole story of maginsky and when a documentary that was intended to blame Russia, the filmers found out Browder lied, EU and USA banned the documentary to cover for Browder. You cant even find the documentary anymore. Read below and all other articles on Consortium News
Guardians of the Magnitsky Myth
July 21, 2018
As Russia-gate becomes the go-to excuse to marginalize and suppress independent and dissident media in the United States, a warning of what the future holds is the blacklisting of a documentary that debunks the so-called Magnitsky case.
The emerging outlines of the broader suppression are now apparent in moves by major technology companies – under intense political pressure – to unleash algorithms that will hunt down what major media outlets and mainstream “fact-checkers” (with their own checkered histories of getting facts wrong) deem to be “false” and then stigmatize that information with pop-up “warnings” or simply make finding it difficult for readers using major search engines.
For those who believe in a meaningful democracy, those tactics may be troubling enough, but the Magnitsky case, an opening shot in the New Cold War with Russia, has demonstrated how aggressively the Western powers-that-be behave toward even well-reported investigative projects that unearth inconvenient truth.
Throughout the U.S. and Europe, there has been determined effort to prevent the American and European publics from seeing this detailed documentary that dissects the fraudulent claims at the heart of the Magnitsky story.
The documentary – “The Magnitsky Act: Behind the Scenes” – was produced by filmmaker Andrei Nekrasov, who is known as a fierce critic of Russian President Vladimir Putin but who in this instance found the West’s widely accepted, anti-Russian Magnitsky storyline to be a lie.
However, instead of welcoming Nekrasov’s discoveries as an important part of the debate over the West’s policies toward Russia, the European Parliament pulled the plug on a premiere in Brussels and – except for a one-time showing at the Newseum in Washington – very few Americans have been allowed to see the documentary.
Instead, we’re fed a steady diet of the frothy myth whipped up by hedge-fund investor William
Browder and sold to the U.S. and European governments as the basis for sanctioning Russian officials. For years now, Browder has been given a free hand to spin his dog-ate-my-homework explanation about how some of his firms got involved a $230 million tax fraud in Russia.
Browder insists that some “corrupt” Russian police officers stole his companies’ corporate seals and masterminded a convoluted conspiracy. But why anyone would trust a hedge-fund operator who got rich exploiting Russia’s loose business standards is hard to comprehend.
The answer is that Browder has used his money and political influence to scare off and silence anyone who dares point to the glaring contradictions and logical gaps in his elaborate confection.
So, the hedge-fund guy who renounced his U.S. citizenship in favor of a British passport gets the royal treatment whenever he runs to Congress. His narrative just fits so neatly into the demonization of Russia and the frenzy over stopping “Russian propaganda and disinformation” by whatever means necessary….
https://consortiumnews.com/2018/07/21/guardians-of-the-magnitsky-myth-2/
Guardians of the Magnitsky Myth
Part 2
This summer, Browder testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee and argued that people involved in arranging the one-time showing of Nekrasov’s documentary should be prosecuted for violating the Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA), which carries a five-year prison term.
Meanwhile, the U.S. mainstream media helps reinforce Browder’s dubious tale by smearing anyone who dares question it as a “Moscow stooge” or a “useful idiot.”
Magnitsky and Russia-gate
The Magnitsky controversy now has merged with the Russia-gate affair because Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya, who traveled to America to challenge Browder’s account, arranged a meeting with Donald Trump Jr. and other Trump campaign advisers in June 2016 to present this other side of the story.
Though nothing apparently came from that meeting, The New York Times, which always treats Browder’s account as flat fact, led its Saturday editions with a breathless story entitled, “A Kremlin Link to a Memo Taken to Trump Tower,” citing similarities between Veselnitskaya’s memo on the Magnitsky case and an account prepared by “one of Russia’s most powerful officials, the prosecutor general Yuri Y. Chaika.” Cue the spooky music as the Times challenges Veselnitskaya’s honesty.
Yet, the Times article bows to Browder as the ultimate truth-teller, including repetition of his assertion that Sergei Magnitsky was a whistleblowing “tax lawyer,” rather than one of Browder’s accountants implicated in the tax fraud.
While Magnitsky’s profession may seem like a small detail, it gets to the heart of the mainstream media’s acceptance of Browder’s depiction of Magnitsky – as a crusading lawyer who died of medical neglect in a Russian prison – despite overwhelming evidence that Magnitsky was really a clever accountant caught up in the scheme.
The “lawyer” falsehood – so eagerly swallowed by the Times and other mainstream outlets – also bears on Browder’s overall credibility: If he is lying about Magnitsky’s profession, why should anyone believe his other self-serving claims?
As investigative reporter Lucy Komisar noted in a recent article on the case, Browder offered a different description when he testified under oath in a New York court deposition in a related federal civil case.
In that adversarial setting, when Browder was asked if Magnitsky had a law degree, Browder said, “I’m not aware that he did.” When asked if Magnitsky had gone to law school, Browder answered: “No.”
Yet, the Times and the rest of the mainstream media accept that Magnitsky was a “lawyer,” all the better to mislead the American public regarding his alleged role as a whistleblower.
The rest of Browder’s story stretches credulity even more as he offers a convoluted explanation of how he wasn’t responsible for bogus claims made by his companies to fraudulently sneak away with $230 million in refunded taxes.
Rather than show any skepticism toward this smarmy hedge-fund operator and his claims of victimhood, the U.S. Congress and mainstream media just take him at his word because, of course, his story fits the ever-present “Russia bad” narrative.
Plus, these influential people have repeated the falsehoods so often and suppressed contrary evidence with such arrogance that they apparently feel that they get to define reality, which – in many ways – is what they want to do in the future by exploiting the Russia-gate hysteria to restore their undisputed role as the “gatekeepers” on “approved” information.
Which is why Americans and Europeans should demand the right to see the Nekrasov documentary and make their own judgments, possibly with Browder given a chance after the show to rebut the overwhelming evidence of his deceptions.
Instead, Browder has used his wealth and connections to make sure that almost no one gets to see the deconstruction of his fable. And The New York Times is okay with that.
https://consortiumnews.com/2018/07/21/guardians-of-the-magnitsky-myth-2/
Read this article to know more of what an absolute crook and liar Browder is, and how congress accepts his lies to demonize Russia (many more articles from Robert Parry)
A Blacklisted Film and the New Cold War
August 2, 2017
Special Report: As Congress still swoons over the anti-Kremlin Magnitsky narrative,Western political and media leaders refuse to let their people view a documentary that debunks the fable, reports Robert Parry.
By Robert Parry (Updated Aug. 4 with more on Magnitsky not a lawyer.)
Why is the U.S. mainstream media so frightened of a documentary that debunks the beloved story of how “lawyer” Sergei Magnitsky uncovered massive Russian government corruption and died as a result? If the documentary is as flawed as its critics claim, why won’t they let it be shown to the American public, then lay out its supposed errors, and use it as a case study of how such fakery works?
https://consortiumnews.com/2017/08/02/a-blacklisted-film-and-the-new-cold-war/
Anons you might be interested to read this article on Browder and US government because it ties in deeply with the Ukraine revolution and USAid, Soros and browder creating a whole myth about Russian and the ousted Ukrainian President