>>16060787

>Truth Social

>>16059960 (pb)

Seems to me truth social is a closed platform.

I signed up day 1, for 3 accounts, none have been allowed on yet.

Waitlist numbers haven't changed once.

At this point it loos like just a private messaging platform for conservative politicians and their mouthpieces.

It would be great if it worked, but if nobody can use it then what good is it?

It's effectively an echo chamber where conservative bounce ideas off each other while anons are locked out.

Which is what twitter is for libtards.

Wonder how many posting here are actually allowed on there. I bet not many…

>>16060906

Who knows? That's my point.

Only a few people could even see it if he did.

It's not a social media platform.

It's a private signal messenger on steroids, or a private version of telegram.

Just seems to me it is not even close to what it was sold as.

Maybe in a year or so it will come around.

Until then it's about as useless to anons as twitter.

>>16060922

>I wouldn't take offense if unable to don't get on.

I feel no offense whatsoever.

Same as I feel if twitter doesn't want me.

I don't care if platforms want to be private.

Private platforms should exist to some extent.

My annoyance is how they marketed it.

Don't market it as an open platform where conservatives can share ideas.

Because that, it is not.

Here is the best place anyways imho.

>>16060930

Agreed

>>16061009

>8Kun is the Wild Wild West of Free Speech.

Amen brother.

I'll take wild west over manhattan any day.