>>1606860
<attempted a pullback.
I presume that to mean that there's still a lack of understanding in that subject area, so it should be discussed under certain circumstance (such as quality expanded posts with citations and how it relates to Q's posts in that regard); besides I have not once before this seen anyone lay out a decent post suggesting the Netherworld as 'N' in this case.. that being said, bitching at baker for not including it is foolish, because the subject is generally considered a slide, however it IS considered a slide because so many people post short bullshit speculations like "muh N is nephlim/natural/noahide/nefertiti/nani" without adding any substance to the argument, and by this point everyanon has their own pet theory on what N is.. And besides; Q's response was to Natural Economic Order anyway, in regards to going too deep.
(however, going too deep and attempting a pullback could very well relate to concepts of a Netherworld order.. such as resurrecting the dead and traveling beyond the river Styx.)