My question is what happens when twit says no? The DS isn't going to give up an essential echo chamber like like and walk away.
"rethink my position" obviously he could sell off and make a ton of cash but how does that effect twit other than maybe dropping the stonk price?
I don't see how though? They don't care about twits stonk price. It's not a business for them. If they cared about shit like that they would alter CNN to be profitable.
I see Musk either getting the company or cashing out. I don't see twitter losing a fucking thing in this.
Win Win for Musk.
Win Win for twit.
>>16074180 Kek. Anon thought it was this one….
I understand but Musk stated his goal was to take twit private. That is not in the best interests of the share holders.
anon, re read what I wrote. Taking the company private is not in the best interests of the share holders so the idea that twit not selling to Musk because of fiduciary responsibility is incorrect.
twit doesn't give a fuck about optics, they don't care if their stonk tanks, it is a win win. either he stays and they can keep the price up, or he leaves and they don't need to deal with him.
to the public yes.
but how many times have we said "this is it for XXX, they just proved they are a hypocrite!"
only for the left to circle the wagons and protect their own because they care about winning more than anything. They do not play the same moral game we do anon.
for the short term. Thats like saying as soon as you go public, once your shares rise, you have to sell your company because it guaranteed your share holders more money than they had.
doesn't seem like it would be to hard to convince even patriotic special operations members to blow up a RU ship.
all these posts about how it's so sick that he has enough money to purchase twit.
idiots, he's trying to give that money to you fuckers at an over valued stock price! it's literally him re-distributing his wealth.