THANK YOU IVE BEEN CONCERNFAGGING ON THIS
Redundancy should allow everything hosted t stay active? Wouldn't they replace one and then the other to avoid interruption of service to customers?
Hate to be that guy, but this is NOTABLE.
What's the significance of the socks?
Ah. I thought I saw a pic of them yesterday and wondered if they tied into something.
Right, the owner of the server farm/company should have some sort of statement on their website as this would affect everyone that has servers there.
So you tore down your own suggestion? LOL. I think we found a clown.
If Jim Watkins is comped you think he's gonna give me the info or just tell me "it's nothing"?
That's why we dig.
ARCHIVE ANONS
So you can leave a source up and take a source down, right? These things have so many redundancies for just typical issues.
Do you find this suspicious at all?
Thanks, BO. Are you aware of the downtime at all? Legit? You get a notice through email from the provider or anything?
Looks like a deviant fuck.
That site has it's own backups and copies of Q's stuff so it stays up. Now the grabbing of anything new that might happen will probably be delayed.
Can't hurt. Thanks for the responses, Anon. God bless.
FYI I'm more worried about losing the data here. They have my info.