">>1606750 ; >>1606818 BO character witness for DadeSkyAnon"

It is certainly worth pointing out, for the sake of truth-- and intending no offense-- that BO failed a Turing test last night, and subsequently used his ban powers to stifle follow-up, then used ban powers again today to further suppress discussion of the failed test.

Quite apart from the implications of these developments in general-- I would take BO's "personal" vouching for any alleged Intel dropping anon with the perverbial grain of salt. Indeed, is be inclined to proceed in the opposite direction of what "he" vouches.

Again, no offense intended.. But it should be painfully obvious what's up with this board.

>>1608057

It's difficult to get real discussion going on this board now. The humans have mostly been crowded out by AI that produces a high volume of of non-helpful posts of every imaginable kind.

You have a good point. I think most people understand the how extensive this fight is, and are able to stay the course (considering all that we have seen so far). But the reality of human perception on this board is much different from the outward projection.

Does BO's Turing test belong in notables?