Treason
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1515176792956547074.html
>Here is a link for the court file on Scribd
>https://www.scribd.com/document/569757736/67-Opinion-and-Order-Denying-Sussmann-Motion-to-Dismiss
o7
Oops, I think you posted the April 13 filing by mistake.
Here is the April 15 filing
https://www.scribd.com/document/570091923/70-Memorandum-in-Opposition-Re-Sussmann-Motion-in-Limine-by-USA
All good.
What jumped out at me after reading, is how Durham really has built a bullet proof case.
Main 'objection' from Sussman's lawyers is that the email communications between Perkins Coie and the Clinton Campaign are 'attorney client privilege' and are not admissible.
Durham's all haha, caught you, we're just going to prove that contrary to Sussman's claim he wasn't working for Clinton, we have proof he was, here are redacted emails TO and FROM the parties who denied involvement.
>Yota phone WAS SEEN CONNECTING to the Executive Office of the President.
OMG hahahaha Q just let it all happen and got them all on record.
They. Are. Fucked.
Twitter WANTS women to be harassed! Disgusting!
https://notthebee.com/article/libs-of-tiktok-has-been-suspended-from-twitter-again
THEY. CAN'T. STOP. PROJECTING.
THEY 'need' Twitter to censor truth==
Also notice the way Q maneuvered the cult into being compelled to admit they are in a contradiction.
Sussman's lawyers were tricked into PUBLISHING statements that cannot logically co-exist.
On the one hand, Q got the criminals into needing to declare "attorney client privilege".
But that can't co-exist with the criminal's other statement that Sussman was not working on behalf of Clinton.
Every step Durham takes has a 'nothing can stop what is coming' feel indeed, in this case the logical law of the excluded middle itself is in the forefront.
You can't hold both positions at the same time because each logically precludes the other from being possible.
It's a logic test of deception and holy shit is it working!
B-b-b-but if you don't support 'the current thing'…THEN YOU'RE A CHICKEN.
FALSE
It says they will release the REDACTED documents.
When Durham says they will release the redacted documents, that means they will release the redacted documents.
Page4
This is checkmate
This is the one passage in the April 15 filing that I personally believe is the most crucial.
See how Q got 'em trapped?
Sussman and Clinton's lawyers are trying to claim 'attorney client privilege' AND 'there is no attorney client relationship' AT THE SAME TIME.
Durham isn't just building an 'empirical evidence' case…
Durham has got the criminals to be compelled to logically contradict themselves, their own dialectic inversions that used to be successfully covered up by fake news, are now exposed to the world.
It is logically impossible for anyone to assert that a communication is 'privileged' between A and B, AND assert that there is no privileged communication relationship between A and B.
Payseur is the antiChrist
The timing and content of Durham's filings are ALSO 'bait' to get the criminals to contradict themselves.
The previous filing of Durham asserting the Sussman lied when he said he was not working for Clinton, and that Durham intends to introduce email communications as evidence, that compelled the criminals to assert attorney client privilege.
But by asserting attorney client privilege, they ADMIT the existence of an attorney client relationship!
You know, this whole saga is also teaching me HOW to think like a prosecutor.
Hey Satanic Pedovore cult, do you feel the walls closing in?
DID YOU SEE WHAT DURHAM JUST DID? HE GOT YOUR LAWYER SWAMP PIECES OF SHIT TO SAY THAT THERE IS NO ATTORNEY CLIENT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUSSMAN AND CLINTON AAAAAAAAAAAAND THAT THE SUPPOSEDLY NON-EXISTENT COMMUNICATIONS ARE PROTECTED UNDER ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE!
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
YOU'RE ALL GOING DOWN
My guess is that Al Waleed's Twitter account is not controlled by Al Waleed.
It's bigoted and contradictory for the 'I can identify as whoever I want" radical communists to deny Musk his identity.
Fucking racist hypocrites.
Checkmate
>no one knows
When Q references Anon's comment, without adding any text, just a reference as the post, that is ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS aconfirmation.
Only when Q adds 'contrary' text would Q be referencing it to rebut it.
>Let it go
No.
>kys
KYS
>>Let it go
>agreed
No.
When Q references a drop without any additional text, it is a confirmation.
YOU 'let it go'
I got a question.
When you realize your own attempts to scare or intimidate or frighten or concern or deflect Anons, Anon knowsYOU'RE ONLY PROJECTING YOUR OWN FEARS BITCH
See how the Satanic fucks operate?
They project and INTRODUCE a dialectic of smears and of guilt.
They HOPE the sheep will 'ingest' that dialectic and perceive THEMSELVES as guilty, to demoralize and control.
Shouldn't popes be introducing LOVE AND COMPASSION narrative to 'motivate' that out of followers?
In related news, Netflix is publishing a bunch of stand up comedy acts, like this one piece of shit who spewed anti-white narrative (the 'comedian' was himself white) against the people of Louisiana, and urged the crowd to manifest hatred and contempt for the entire state.
Fuuuuuuuck YOU you projecting psychotic demons. Take your own psychosis and shove it up your asses.
The world is NOT itself constituted by the warped mental disorder of self-alienated venom spewers.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/04/racists-pope-francis-goes-woke-good-friday-message-accusing-west-racism-describing-jesus-refugee/?utm_source=Gab&utm_campaign=websitesharingbuttons
Go fuck yourself.
There will be no WW3.
The cult is going down and no amount of deflection can stop it.
F&G