Anonymous ID: 74837d April 16, 2022, 7:18 a.m. No.16087055   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7084

I'm enjoying the shit out of this Durham filing, Sussman and attys didn't game out everything before challenging Durham.

 

Dr, Cleveland said that the defense was going to attack the memory of Baker and Priestap and it was a miracle Durham got the text message in time for the next court meeting (or maybe he had it all the time)

Anonymous ID: 74837d April 16, 2022, 7:32 a.m. No.16087109   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>16086919

Heโ€™s just asking the FBI to be dragged into this and make it bakers fault, but his biggest mistake was โ€œtexting, not on behalf of a clientโ€. They can argue baker should hsve known but it doesnt matter

Anonymous ID: 74837d April 16, 2022, 7:43 a.m. No.16087158   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7174

>>16087084

And Durham us only asking for email that are not privileged that they discussed the scheme wihole legal advice, that would be barred as privileged. And HRC and all them scheming to commit a crime is not privileged but a crime

 

They must think they are dealing with a normal DOJ atty, they are not!

Anonymous ID: 74837d April 16, 2022, 8:22 a.m. No.16087341   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>16087307

this is where Durham quotes law, why he won't immunize Joffe, but remember DOJ immunized Clinton's lawyers when interviewed by FBI.. Sussman, et al thought they were working with the dumb in the bag DOJ attorneys