>>16087490
This filing last night with Durham, listed multiple potential crimes that Sussman & Joffe engaged in, so the question is why did Durham only charge Sussman with lying to the FBI?
I think I know, he says it himself in the filing, we wanted to see what Sussman would bring up for a defense, (and basically gather more evidence) because Durham and team wanted Sussman to expose everything and his attorney's were planning at trial.
The potential reason why only one charge, especially since he is pointing on multiple serious (very serious) charges, I think Durham has been trying for a long time, to get Sussman and Joffe to flip and be "states witness" for bigger fish. MUCH bigger fish.
Durham basically lists out every crime they committed in this pleading, which is not normal to my understanding, but in addition, how Durham and team trial strategy and how they it's backed up by law. They state specific law after each argument.
I think Sussman and Joffe are afraid to die, so they haven't taken a deal, and why Durham didn't fall for it when Sussman said Joffe should have immunity.
Does anyone law fag know why Sussman was so insistent to give Joffe immunity?
My guess on this is their crimes are much bigger and things will come out at Sussman's trial, so would Joffe still be immune from prosecution?