The Quantum Mechanics promotion in the Notables is a slide

 

From a few hours ago

 

"The question is no longer whether quantum theory is correct, but what it means."

 

This is an untrue statement ^^^^

 

"On Quantum Non-locality"

http://milesmathis.com/nonlocal.pdf

 

"I have already disproved quantum non-locality

in my papers on superposition,

where I explain the old

experiments with real and diagrammable qualities and quantities. But here I will show in more detail how and why quantum non-locality was always nothing more than a terrible mistake.

To do this, let us start by analyzing the first paragraphs at the Wikipedia page on quantum non-locality.

This is paragraph two on that page:

Experiments have generally favoured quantum mechanics as a description of nature, over local hidden variable

theories.[1][2] Any physical theory that supersedes or replaces quantum theory must make similar experimental

predictions and must therefore also be nonlocal in this sense; quantum nonlocality is a property of the universe

that is independent of our description of nature.

That's all either propaganda or an outright lie, depending on how you want to look at it. To prove that,

let me start by reminding you that I have explained the experiments with real, mechanically assigned

variables. Not “hidden” variables, but rigorously assigned variables, with real motions. My solutions

to these problems are not mathematical only. They are both physical and visualizable, and I have

provided the diagrams to prove that. So in hindsight, we can see that the experiments never favored the

old rule-breaking that has stood as quantum mechanics for 90 years. The old experiments just provided

us with outcomes. Those outcomes couldn't possibly favor non-local or non-real solutions. Those

outcomes only demanded logical explanations. Since the old guys couldn't provide those logical

explanations, they provided illogical explanations instead, but then sold these illogical explanations

under the cover of novelty and new science. They convinced several generations of physicists that

these illogical explanations were the only possible explanations. Beyond that, they prevented

physicists after them from trying to find logical explanations. They did that with authoritative

pronouncements like the Copenhagen Interpretation, and by trying to shame anyone that disagreed with

them. The leader of this suppression of science, Niels Bohr, took on Einstein first, trying to silence him

with debating tricks and false conclusions. Although any sensible person who follows those debates

can tell Einstein destroyed Bohr and his minions, we are told the opposite. Since Bohr's followers

outnumbered Einstein's followers, they simply declared victory in the press in as many places as they

could, and they have been declaring victory ever since. We see it at Wikipedia to this day, where the

authors claim that everyone agrees Bohr won the debates. That simply isn't true, and many top

physicists sided with Einstein, including Planck and Schrodinger and many others. Many physicists

still don't believe in non-locality, to their everlasting credit. "

 

I have many more citations but his is not "Q" research. I believe and know synchronization and synchronicity exist as a force in Nature and as a manifestation of consciousness. However, "Quantum Mechanics" is BS. Sorry .

 

Not settled science. Just as "Trump is an asshole" is not settled political opinion; though some would claim it is.

 

Quantum Mechanics meets

Conspiracy Theory

http://milesmathis.com/qmsheep.pdf