Anonymous ID: 154147 June 1, 2018, 4:48 p.m. No.1610956   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1076

https://www.lifezette.com/polizette/valerie-jarrett-must-explain-her-clinton-foundation-coverups/

 

Bad as the Clinton Foundation predicament was by November 2008, Team Obama nonetheless decided Hillary Clinton had to hold a choice appointment in the historic president's Cabinet.

 

Swindling colleagues in the U.S. Senate. If senators were to confirm Clinton as secretary of state, a majority had to be satisfied that conflicts and potential conflicts between the international work of the Clinton Foundation and her role as chief diplomat would be avoided or managed, thus protecting the interests of American taxpayers.

 

Thus was born the memorandum of understanding (MOU) that described a series of measures Clinton agreed to take to reassure senators and the public that there would be no conflicts between her official duties and the interests of the foundation. You can read the real MOU here.

 

Lawyers will confirm that an MOU is not legally enforceable, and they will note that the Clinton MOU doesn't even name as one of its parties the former president, the person most likely to have actual conflicts of interest. The MOU is Swiss cheese because it has so many holes you can almost see through it.

 

Moreover, no portion of the description of any part of the foundation is accurate, as is made clear by the above referenced links. Why, then, did Jarrett affix her signature to the MOU and thereby assent to its terms on Nov. 16, 2008?