From Margot Clevelands latest article

Call to Dig on Sussman Memorandums

What Sussmann Told the CIA

The first memorandum, dated January 31, 2017, summarized what Sussmann told a former CIA employee in hopes of scoring a meeting with the CIA.

During Sussmann’s February 9, 2017 meeting with the CIA, the memorandum notes that Sussmann provided the agency thumb drives with separate data files for the Yotaphone by the location of the “domain name system” or DNS lookups, including one for Trump’s Central Park apartment, one for the EOP, one for Spectrum Health Care, and one for the Trump Tower

Both memorandums attached

https://thefederalist.com/2022/04/20/new-documents-suggest-democrats-sicced-the-cia-on-their-domestic-enemy-the-president/

Docs: Democrats Sicced The CIA On Their Domestic Enemy, Trump

Margot Cleveland

(This is getting good…no wonder Durham is taking a long time. A WW conspiracy that when on for many years before POTUS even announced).

….Adding Some Pressure to the Deal

Sussmann did more than merely pass on this information, however. He also “claimed that his client did not want to provide this [information] to the FBI as he knows that the FBI did not have resources to deal with these issues,” but also that the source—or Sussmann, it is not clear which—“did not trust the FBI” because Sussman is “openly a Democrat” and “does lots of work for the DNC.” Sussmann added “that his client would most likely only provide the data to senior bona fide [redacted] officers (active duty) and if there is no interest, he would most likely go to [the] New York Times.”

To further push for the CIA meeting, Sussmann then stressed that, given that he is “an experienced attorney with full clearances and lots of [redacted] experience, he believes that this client is telling the truth as he knows it.” “He cares about the security of the country” and wanted the CIA “to know about the Yotaphone activity close to the President,” Sussmann claimed.

Sussmann’s preview of this Yotaphone “intel” to his contact served its purpose, with the CIA arranging to meet with Sussmann in person less than two weeks later, on February 9, 2017. At that meeting, Sussmann again noted that he was passing the current information directly to the CIA “based on how the FBI had handled” the information he had previously provided that agency.

During Sussmann’s February 9, 2017 meeting with the CIA, the memorandum notes that Sussmann provided the agency thumb drives with separate data files for the Yotaphone by the location of the “domain name system” or DNS lookups, including one for Trump’s Central Park apartment, one for the EOP, one for Spectrum Health Care, and one for the Trump Tower.

That data, Sussmann told the CIA agents, related to DNS information, “indicat[ed] that a Russian-made Yota-phone had been seen by [Sussmann’s contacts] connecting to the WiFi from the Trump Tower in New York, as well as a from a location in Michigan, at the same time that then-candidate Trump was believed to be at these locations.”

These People Were Watching Trump For Years

The data included in those files, however, reflected but a segment of the DNS lookups by the Yotaphones. The special counsel discovered that fact when it obtained more complete DNS data from a company that assisted Joffe in assembling the Yotaphone allegations.

For instance, the more complete data assembled by Joffe and his associates showedthe DNS lookups involving the EOP began at least as early as 2014, but Sussmann omitted that detail when providing the material to the CIA.

(There it is HRC, Obama etc. Had been spying on POTUS for many years. Didnt the Project Guy say this, they recorded years of Trumps calls etc)

That Joffe and his associates had assembled more complete DNS data related to the Yotaphones than that provided to the CIA—data that disproves the Trump-Russia collusion theory—is a huge scandal:

Those allegations indicate an intent to deceive by omission….

(I attached to two Sussman memorandums in prior post on this bread)

https://thefederalist.com/2022/04/20/new-documents-suggest-democrats-sicced-the-cia-on-their-domestic-enemy-the-president/

>>16113090

Sussman Memorandum 1 screenshots

What Sussmann Told the CIA

The first memorandum, dated January 31, 2017, summarized what Sussmann told a former CIA employee in hopes of scoring a meeting with the CIA. Sussmann said his client “had some interesting information about the presence and activity of a unique Russian made phone around President Trump.” Sussmann claimed the activity started in April 2016 when Trump was working out of the Trump Tower on its Wi-Fi network. That phone was also used on the “Wi-Fi at Trump’s apartment at Grand Central Park West,” according to Sussmann.

>>16113090

Sussman Memorandum 2 screenshots

During Sussmann’s February 9, 2017 meeting with the CIA, the memorandum notes that Sussmann provided the agency thumb drives with separate data files for the Yotaphone by the location of the “domain name system” or DNS lookups, including one for Trump’s Central Park apartment, one for the EOP, one for Spectrum Health Care, and one for the Trump Tower. That data, Sussmann told the CIA agents, related to DNS information, “indicat[ed] that a Russian-made Yota-phone had been seen by [Sussmann’s contacts] connecting to the WiFi from the Trump Tower in New York, as well as a from a location in Michigan, at the same time that then-candidate Trump was believed to be at these locations.” What Sussmann Told the CIA

>>16113270

Better shot of page 2

>>16113237

Yes definitely going down

>>16113219

Kek, democrat governors freakin because deSantis is revealing what should be done! Awesome

>>16113216

Anyone that reads The Hill should be deceived, these people’s desperation is starting to stink bad

Blow by blow by Professor Cleveland

Part 1 of 2

Margot Cleveland

@ProfMJCleveland

THREAD:Sussmann hearing starting now. Toll Free Number: 888-204-5984

Access Code: 8981531 Will live tweet to extent possible.

10:31 AM · Apr 20, 2022

2/ Judge tries to frame issue: Gov't not discussing accuracy unless you open door. but will 1) concluded not valid; 2) steps; 3) and technical terms. Have I framed that correctly & what precisely is your objection?

10:40 AM · Apr 20, 2022·Twitter Web App

3/ "Not as clean as court suggests" based as filing–suggest broader. As to accuracy of data: "through cross examination or otherwise". What does that mean? We don't intend to say there was a link, but may put into evidence Sussmann would have "reasonably believed" and need

4/ lay foundation, so does that open door that Sussmann or someone else couldn't have known. We want to know if that opens door and if so what will he say. He'll say person with basic familiarity with TOR, would not believe page 21, would know inaccurate.

5/ 1) how relevant; and how to get expert to review that. Judge: DOJ why does this matter? DOJ: Need to distinguish b/w truth versus cherry picked. Defense is not saying there WAS a communication.

6/ DOJ: Position is no secret channel. Judge: Did not support existance, not there was none. 2 different things. DOJ: Mueller Gov't had concluded not true and FBI; one or both of companies who maintain servers & show no communication.

7/ DOJ: Made the case about materiality, so jury needs to understand decision tree & involvement of those companies in investigation is part of it. If they concede no communication channel, no need to go into it.

8/ Sussmann: troubled about factual issues about underlying information after the tip.

9/ Sussmann says irrelevant & a trial within a trial. Not about if accurate, or conclusions accurate. What witneesses said will prejudice jury. Okay in general about investigative steps, but gov't not tying what sussmann knew (motive). Re materiality, issue is what they would

10/ do if they knew, is different than if data is accurate. Court: It is relevant to materiality, why not just agents, and do you need companies? DOJ: Those people best able to say what those servers are? Court: I thought that was your expert? DOJ: Not an expert in mass market

11/ FBI did reach out to these companies, it is central to hear from these companies, how did that played into the investigative steps. Court: Companies didn't have anything to do with that, DOJ, what fbi did/public and private steps took and could have taken.

12/ doj: need to say no channel, or jury might buy conspiracy theory. Court: On face has to be known to sussmann, but white papers go further and say mass marketing & and downplay it.

13/ Sussmann: 10,000 pages of data. Okay re general steps. We are not saying there is no channel. We aren't going to get into that game.

14/ Court: Any objection to bullet points on page 3?

Sussmann: first third bullets no, but next three yes. Exh. 1700 (yikes) need to look to get proper scope. Martin was police officer on street 10 years ago may not be qulified. (jerk attorney)

15/ sussmann: why are cia's analysis relevant? the analyst is on witness list anymore. data suggests provider not plausible: CIA is not concluding fabricated. Yotaphone inaccuracy shouldn't come in at all. And CIA's meeting is only relevant if he repeated.

16/ Sussmann: There is an overlap on the DNS data and whitepaper; but entirely separate about Yotaphone and other issues. DOJ: CIA concluded not a true allegation and in feb. 2017, past back to FBI. CIA believed it was created by the users!! WHOA! but Special Counsel has not

17/ reached that conclusion!!! Sussmann: Not a tradeoff. They said we are not intending to get to accuracy of data, but everything they said is about accuracy of data.

18/ They are talking past each each other: Sussmann says saying no communication channel is attacking data. That's not what DOJ is saying.

19/ If Sussmann were involved or had knowledge, or gather in improper or illegal manner, then relevant as to motive–Sussmann grudgingly agrees. Sussmann says no such evidence.

https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1516786636545273861?s=20&t=GpJiUwvGpkcH-W2CTcvoMw

>>16113569

Blow by blow with Prof. Cleveland

Sussman hearing

Part 2 of 2

20/ Sussmann: Dozens of communications between researchers Sussmann was not on, and that should not come in. Court: DOJ has proferred evidence with Researcher 2 about whether legal, billing records showing helped draft white paper, knew it was private collection, question

21/ Why isn't that relevant to motive? Sussmann: Different than manipulated, presented in an incorrect way. DOJ: Primary theory on admission gathering is those are streams that allow Government to show which client was involved for the presentation, (motive too).

22/ 3 papers: dagon, joffe/Sussmann, fusion gps (clinton), that will allow the jury to evaulate who client is but the motive is there. Tech 1 and Clinton were intimatedly involved in getting the whitepapers to fbi/cia.

23/ Court: why do you need more than billing? Isn't that duplicative? Doj: no, there is very little in email headers/billing, the jury would not have anything near full context of how this was to client, not more prejudicial than probative–that is exactly how they were create

24/ Sussmann: don't need to prove in violation of contract (but that goes to motive). Paper 3 was wikipeadia page basically about ala bank Fusion prepared.

25/ Court will get something out on accuracy/preparation next week. Court moves to privilege. Defillipis will reply Monday.

26/ Court: Need to streamline this/maybe over lap.

Sussmann: Short reply on motion in limine.

27/28 My take-away: Some shaving around the edges to limit what Durham can present, but leaving most issues for trial to decide.

https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1516786636545273861?s=20&t=GpJiUwvGpkcH-W2CTcvoMw

Kekkity they’re still attacking LibsOfTikToc and complaining on her reporting on what they actually said

I wonder if they know their perversion is going deeper and wider with more eyes on, by calling attention to this site!

https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1516807025308622861?s=20&t=GpJiUwvGpkcH-W2CTcvoMw

Their hideous life killing and joy destroying plan has been toppled and now they are pissed about it; and call us names!

Kek this is awesome how upset they are.

Just wait until Fauci is hauled away, the universal REEEEEEEE of the left will deafening!

https://twitter.com/MZHemingway/status/1516774523101761543?s=20&t=GpJiUwvGpkcH-W2CTcvoMw

What is quite amazing is conservatives are fighting back and they are louder and stronger because of @LibsofTikToc account!

There’s a real momentum of freedom loving people rising up with one shout. And Libs are losing it big time. Anons can you feel it?

https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1516609085675909127?s=20&t=DXNdRmFp1Yc2IaEBuZ__jA

https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1516609085675909127?s=20&t=DXNdRmFp1Yc2IaEBuZ__jA

Jason Beale

@jabeale

…"joined" - where is it you're serving?If you're in Kviv, you're standing within 100 yards of the rest of the world's media, who are wearing North Face jackets and sweater-vestsas their "combat kit".

Malcolm Nance the phony patriot is getting called out like the stooge he is!

https://twitter.com/jabeale/status/1516610447616663561?s=20&t=DXNdRmFp1Yc2IaEBuZ__jA

Fill in the blank

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1516620752040116231?s=20&t=DXNdRmFp1Yc2IaEBuZ__jA