Seems to me the MIL-time version of "For 11/22/63" post string might be relevant to why we're here.

>>16112263 (pb)

It could be argued with some small merit that Q-team wouldn't "waste" those post digits, and so this further adds anecdotal credibility to the clock.

>>16113340

Only 7-letter day of week is Tuesday.

If "Tonight," and Qclock is a thing (it is) then 23:32 DT (not sure if EDT is the time of record) makes "5:5" and we are at 2:35am on Qclock today, "5:5"?

Or juest reverse 2+3:32 for "2:35"… who knows.