Anonymous ID: 5ea9ec June 1, 2018, 7 p.m. No.1612240   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2255 >>2451

>>1612193

have faith that humanity will win this anon…..there is no other option. The evil you speak of has always been here, the battle has always been fought…..tables turn and the process repeats…..always……it is the faith that will comfort you…the knowledge that once the evil is exposed and dealt with, humanity will win….I personally have the same cognition and share your feelings, but it's not fear I chose to allow at the top of my mind, it is joy that the evil will be exposed…..2 sides to all coins…..humanity will always win.

Anonymous ID: 5ea9ec June 1, 2018, 7:23 p.m. No.1612462   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2493

>>1612442

my thoughts…..blatantly attempting anons to censor it so it can eventually be used for future coded messages which will be disregarded. Hence the importance of "everything is relevant"

Anonymous ID: 5ea9ec June 1, 2018, 7:25 p.m. No.1612492   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1612465

ya I know…I would feel sorry for POTUS, but I am of the mind he is enjoying this way more than most would…he doesn't want to be POTUS in the first place. I can see him with a nice bag of popcorn watching the board as we speak.

Anonymous ID: 5ea9ec June 1, 2018, 7:32 p.m. No.1612574   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1612493

interesting thought…..if consent is indeed requested outright, would be huge, but to allow the choice to be made by anons doesn't seem like consent to me…it was debated hard on whether or not BO or others should outright ban plain as day bots and shill. Furthermore, AI is only as smart as the retard who programmed it's matrix and therefor cannot request consent. Perhaps I am missing your meaning though anon..I am listening if you care to elaborate.

Anonymous ID: 5ea9ec June 1, 2018, 8 p.m. No.1612883   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1612736

human analysis would dictate that once into your devices and performing it's programmed perimeter functions there are infinite amounts of variables which one "human" may employ to either halt or confuse an AI entity, i.e. feeding misleading information once perimeters are known. Any "AI" which has infiltrated devices was programmed to do so for a human to interact with the data afterwards. In this day and age, and no I'm not a techie, AI playing out what you are reffering to as infiltration and compilation of private data seems outdated to me. It would be far more effective to create a bot which is always at the ready to be taken over in real time after it has been discovered and deemed irrelevant to a user and used for whatever purpose one chooses..hence, the bot is indeed human…..sorry if you aren't following me on this. As for consent…the devices you use more than likely somewhere along the line in tiny little letters or articulate tomfoolry forced you to consent upon purchase…hell….unless you have built your own devices from dirt on the ground and managed to enter the internet arena without consent of those running the show, they have a way of establishing that you did in fact consent in one way or another. I do get what you are saying though, and agree that no one should have private data exposed. Nowadays though, at least 95 percent (not certified) can barely remember their own phone number without looking at their devices. If privacy is desired, best not to use any device to store it. Not trying to be a dick, just thinking like one to save a few anuses out there from being raped by the real dicks.