Just for kicks, and to trigger the pro jab crowd, I took an article from the dailyexpose.uk, which uses data all traceable to the UK Health Security Agency, and I used that data to calculate mortality rates (deaths per 100k) versus the number of jabs received. This is the result I obtained, which I will try to display below as a table:
# of jabs vs mortality
0 --- 1.67
1 --- 3.45
2 --- 6.53
3 --- 9.46
These results fit to a line fairly well. The least squares regression line fit is
Mortality rate = (# of jabs)(2.65 (+/-.21)) + 1.31 (+/-0.39) in deaths per 100,000 of each population category of jabs received
w/ r = 0.994 (Pearson coefficient. 0 means no correlation while 1 is perfectly correlated by the line)
And for anyone who cares, here's what I have to offer in terms of backup:
Here's a link to the source article:
https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/04/18/19milllion-unvaccinated-31million-not-boosted-england/
and two links for the data which the article is based on. First the population numbers found on page 78 for week 15 ending 4/15/2022:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1069290/Weekly_Flu_and_COVID-19_report_w15_v2.pdf
The death numbers are from page 44 for the week 13 report ending 3/31/2022:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1066759/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-13.pdf
(One has to do some addition to get the totals. I did exactly that and the article numbers checks out, but go ahead and check it yourself.)
Here's the simple arithmetic I performed to extract the mortality rate data I presented in the table above.
Unjabbed 19,184,986 w/ 321 deaths; 321/191.84986 = 1.67 deaths/100k
Received at least one jab 43,945,696 w/ 89 deaths
Total study population is 19,184,986 (the unjabbed) + 43,945,696 (all of the jabbed people) = 63,130,682 which is the same as in the tabulated population data linked above. Used this number for a check sum at the end.
Received at least two jabs 41,365,808 w/ 593 deaths
Received at least three jabs 32,281,561 w/ 3054 deaths Mortality for 3 jab group is 3054/322.81561 = 9.46 deaths per 100k
Calculating # that received only 1 jab and their mortality rate 43,945,696 - 41,365,808 = 2,579,888; 89/25.79888 = 3.45 deaths per 100k
Calculating # that only received 2 jabs and their mortality rate 41,365,808 - 32,281,561 = 9,084,247; 593/90.84247 = 6.53 deaths per 100k
Check that pop numbers for 1 jab, 2 jabs, 3 or more jabs + unjabbed are correct: 19,184,986 + 2,579,888 + 9,084,247 + 32,281,561 = 63,130,682 check sum matches
And just for some more kicks, checking on the article's claim that 31 million not boosted using pop numbers from above, 19,184,986 + 2,579,888 + 9,084,247 = 30,849,121; rounding to the nearest million = 31
Yup, they didn't lie. 31 Million in the UK chose to not take the booster.
Important factoid: Prior to week 15, the number of people in the UK was commonly referred to a about 5 million. In week 15, the population was 'slightly' corrected to roughly 19.2 million.
Whoopsie! I'm sure they're very sorry for misleading the public.
Another factoid reported by the DE: The UK is going to stop reporting COVID data with a detailed breakdown on jab status.
I guess they don't want us to know something. LIke maybe they are trying to kill us?
Nah! It can't be that, right?
(For some reason, I keep thinking about those Georgia Guidestones and Bill Gates, but I can't quite put my finger on it. -and yeah, I do like to be sarcastic on occasion.)