Anonymous ID: 0cff7f April 21, 2022, 4:50 p.m. No.16124577   🗄️.is đź”—kun

Hold on to your hairpiece gramps, it's time for the invitation Q Research shill-on-shill open sewer smack down!

 

They call anyone a bitch

 

They use the - ass suffix

 

They don't care what you think

 

And they want you to agree

 

SHILLS-A-MILLION OVER THE TOP ROPE NAME CALLING!

 

"Ooooh they make me so mad" - Shill anon

Anonymous ID: 0cff7f April 21, 2022, 4:53 p.m. No.16124601   🗄️.is đź”—kun

Ever been part of "the wave" at a sporting event? Stood up at a show or event and applauded because others were applauding without knowing much about who, or what the clapping was for?

 

It is trivial to exploit our human propensity for imitation, to go along with the crowd, and use this to propagate unconscious self-replicating social behaviors (fads, trends, crazes) in a culture for purposes of marketing or for social control.

 

It's common sense that such a phenomenon, ripe for exploitation, is being used by cultist pedovores interested in controlling human behavior – especially the for controlling the future evolution of social and economic systems.

 

Pop culture is not the organic phenomena it appears, but a curated artificial medium engineered to permit rapid introduction and transmission of contagious, conditioned behaviors like purchasing and to spread psychogenic illnesses, self-destructive sexual fetishes etc.

 

Cultures where commerce controls media content and where art is used to sell consumer goods also have the capacity to engineer psychological operations which induce delusions and powerful contagious mental illnesses or collective insanities.

 

Historical incidents and known forms of contagious psychogenic illnesses are described in "Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds" by Charles Mackay.

 

https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/24518

 

In recent years, we have seen mysterious maladies proliferate. Recently, American and European psychologists have been tracking the blue whale game, the Momo challenge, the gorilla glue challenge which use guided imagery, occult symbols sigils and glyphs to evoke a psychic dilemma which persuades victim to ice themselves or huff wasp spray. In addition to obvious mind traps like Momo and the Whale, there are similar cognitive exploits which are far more dangerous.

 

Rothko's basilisk is a logic trap to which a small segment of the population is especially vulnerable -

https://slate.com/technology/2014/07/rokos-basilisk-the-most-terrifying-thought-experiment-of-all-time.html

 

The evil clowns create both the pathology, “induced contagious, epidemic psychogenic illness” and the psyops which exploit it, constantly.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Whale_Challenge

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Momo_Challenge_hoax

 

https://indianexpress.com/article/trending/trending-globally/louisiana-man-tries-gorilla-glue-challenge-with-a-cup-ends-up-in-hospital-7188330/

 

DIG MEME PRAY

Anonymous ID: 0cff7f April 21, 2022, 4:56 p.m. No.16124625   🗄️.is đź”—kun

NY STATE APPELATE COURT RULES

 

Contrary to respondents’ further contention, however, we agree

with petitioners and the court that the congressional map was

unconstitutional in that it violated article III, § 4 (c) (5), which

provides as relevant here that “[d]istricts shall not be drawn to

discourage competition or for the purpose of favoring or disfavoring

incumbents or other particular candidates or political parties.” As

with the procedural issue, petitioners bore the initial burden on this

issue of establishing beyond a reasonable doubt that the 2022

congressional map conflicts with the Constitution (see Viviani, 36

NY3d at 576; Cohen, 19 NY3d at 201-202). Although that is a heavy

burden, the terms of article III, § 4 (c) (5) prohibit the

discouragement of competition or the drawing of districts in order to

favor one party over the other, which permits no level of intentional

discouragement of competition or partisan favoritism (see generally In

re Senate Joint Resolution of Legislative Apportionment 1176, 83 So3d

597, 617 [Fl Sup Ct 2012]). In evaluating whether a party has

established unconstitutional partisan gerrymandering as a factual

matter beyond a reasonable doubt, “[c]ourts have found that direct or

circumstantial evidence may establish that a districting plan was

drawn” with partisan intent (League of Women Voters of Ohio v Ohio

Redistricting Commn., — NE3d —, 2022 WL 110261, *24 [Ohio Sup Ct, Jan.

12, 2022, Nos. 2021-1193, 2021-1198, and 2021-1210]). Recently,

computer modeling and statistical analyses have garnered acceptance as

evidence of partisan intent (see id. at *24-26; League of Women Voters

of Pennsylvania v Commonwealth, 645 Pa 1, 124-126, 178 A3d 737, 818-

820 [2018]).

We conclude that evidence of the largely one-party process used

to enact the 2022 congressional map, a comparison of the 2022

congressional map to the 2012 congressional map, and the expert

opinion and supporting analysis of Sean P. Trende, met petitioners’

burden of establishing that the 2022 congressional map was drawn to

discourage competition and favor democrats in violation of article

III, § 4 (c) (5).