>>160803
I AM concerned about having the proper content, which is why I want to know a) where Q said something referenced (i.e. the boat) was not his, b) why the boat is still in the spreadsheet, c) why it's still on the GitHub page, and d) why nobody has said anything before now, when the map has had 526 downloads? DAFUQ
It makes no difference to me what needs to be pulled out and what needs to be added. If something in there doesn't belong, then it needs to come out. If something is missing, it needs to be added. Checking ….
At this point the only one who can truly confirm it's not Q is Q. Consider the environment: we are overrun with people who don't want us here, who don't want us figuring things out, etc. I am not calling you a liar and I'm not saying you're wrong about this post (or others) not being Q. What I'm saying is that there is no way for me to know. He said, she said, and by definition this is a board of anons. If this and potentially other messages are not Q, then at some point we're going to figure enough out about the map, etc. to be able to see it. Until then, I have to hang onto the post because TMI is better than not enough. We don't know enough at this point for this message - if not Q - to really do much damage. YET.
No specific message # can be given, so none will be. Take note that when somebody wants to screw up the archives, this is how it's done.
The message stays, at least in my own graphic. Everybody else makes their own decisions. This is mine.