it's the bread bread
>it's the bread bread
GUYZ GUYZ
<RED RED
Q CONFURM?
(sorry, feeling so shitposty today. maybe it's the low-energy georgy overdose)
fuuck you're right it's also in the https:// qcodefag.github.io/
Boat pic is the post:
Nov 6 2017 16:50:33
You can see in later post
Nov 9 2017 23:07:15
that the boat pic post is not in there: hence, not Q.
That is one but there is likely more (the street sign pic, harrisburg reference, TEMPEST post, all apocryphs)…
sorry but true.
yup, that's one of them.
Apocryphal Q = fakers/larpers/call it what you will but it's not Q.
Some of those were kept around in archives because they had some interesting twists, but they've been having a nasty habit of popping back every now and then and get newfags excited over false leads (or, at the mininum, not-Q leads).
As i've said multiple times, i think it's fine to keep them somewhere (archive everything etc), but when they get mixed in with the legit confirmed Q posts, then they are a real problem
STOP IT… i was trying to help insane-graph-anon to clean up his project.
at least now he can see how poison these are, in real time.
>Simple solution. Q confirm or deny so time is not absorbed on arguing about this.
>At this point the only one who can truly confirm it's not Q is Q.
SCOOP: he already did, back when these posts were posted.
>no way for me to know
now you're really being shilly… anons who have followed know. i know. others know. Those who read and re-read crumbs know.
>much damage.
we are in it right now, and this happens almost every day. This time it's my fault for trying to get an archivist to do his job right, and fools and/or shills jump in. Sad.
i'll say again: HE ALREADY DID THAT CONFIRMATION.
Oh, it's easy now, months away, to seed doubt, but if you knew enough of the timeline, you'd remember when Q confirmed the maps.
That's what he had to do to clean it up and separate his real posts from the larpers.
Sorry anons, what a mess.
>I don't know that he'll ever address it.
>I don't know that he'll ever address it.
>I don't know that he'll ever address it.
he did. read the crumbs, or ask someone else who's been here longer than you.
i'll probably stop now.